Highlights
• | London managers and stakeholders aimed leverage the 2012 Olympics to improve the image of the city. | ||||
• | London’s image contains some stable cognitive and affective image components. | ||||
• | However, attitudes towards the city were negatively impacted pre-to-post-event. | ||||
• | The image of the 2012 Games improved considerably following the event. | ||||
• | There was no evidence of co-branding between the place and event. |
Abstract
Contemporarily, the hosting of mega-sport-events (MSEs) is one of several strategies used by cities and governments to bring about improvements in a place’s image and recognition. With that in mind, the overall aim of this study, underpinned by theoretical-methodological social representation theory, was to evaluate the domestic image impact of hosting the 2012 Summer Olympic Games for the city of London, and in doing so, whether any image-transfer (or co-branding) processes occurred between the place and event. In addition to adding to the emergent body of work aimed at using social representation theory to measure place image, the authors are among the first to employ a matched-sample research approach to measuring the impact of an MSE on the domestic perceptions of the host. Employing an abductive research strategy, a survey was carried out among the domestic English population (n = 156) to identify cognitive and affective image components, in the form of social representations, of London as a city (or its place brand), the Olympics as a MSE, and the 2012 Games as a one-off event. The content and the structure of the pre-and post-event social representations were established (using image elements cited by at least 15% of the respondents), analysed (using hierarchical cluster analysis) and then compared (within- and between items) to determine whether any changes or image transfer occurred. The findings of this research reveal that the pre-event concerns regarding the hosting of the London 2012 Olympics and the potential of the event to negatively impact the city’s pre-established image, were, to a degree, fulfilled. Conversely, from an event perspective, respondents perceived the Olympics as a somewhat successful enterprise.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professors Paul Downward, Ian Henry, Barrie Houlihan, and Benoît Séguin for their invaluable expertise and feedback. We would also like to thank Clare Mackay for her assistance and suggestions in the editing phase of the write-up.
Notes
1 To increase the internal validity of the study, this abductive preparation process was performed initially by the authors, who then recruited the assistance of two senior academics to establish whether the themes were well-reasoned and the terms in them appropriately placed. Only once a consensus was reached concerning every individual term was the next stage of the analysis performed. This process of researcher collaboration worked to mitigate subjectivity and alleviate potential researcher bias.