Abstract
Previous studies indicate mixed results as to whether social media constitutes ideological echo chambers. This inconsistency may arise due to a lack of theoretical frames that acknowledge the fact that contextual and technological factors allow varying levels of cross-cutting exposure on social media. This study suggests an alternative theoretical lens, divergence of exposure – co-existence of user groups with varying degrees of cross-ideology exposure related to the same issue – as a notion that serves as an overarching perspective. We suggest that mediated spaces, such as social media groups, can serve as enclaves of exposure that offer affordances for formation of user groups irrespective of offline social distinctions. Yet social elements cause some of them to display more cross-ideology exchange than others. To establish this claim empirically, we examine two Facebook page user networks (‘Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields’ and ‘Sri Lankans Hate Channel 4’) that emerged in response to Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields, a controversial documentary broadcast by Channel 4 that accused Sri Lankan armed forces of human rights violation during the final stage of the separatist conflict in Sri Lanka. The results showed that the Facebook group network that supported the claims made by Channel 4 is more diverse in terms of ethnic composition, and is neither assortative nor disassortative across ethnicity, suggesting the presence of cross-ethnicity interaction. The pro-allegiant group was largely homogenous and less active, resembling a passive echo chamber. ‘Social mediation’ repurposes enclaves of exposure to represent polarized ideologies where some venues display cross-ideology exposure, while others resemble an ‘echo chamber’.
Notes
1 Using C = k/(N − 1), from CitationNewman (2010), where k = average degree and N = number of vertices, a random model for SLKF has expected value C = 0.0482 and for SLHC4 has C = 0.0996.
Additional information
Dr. Chamil Rathnayake is a Lecturer in Media and Communication at the University of Strathclyde. He has a PhD in Communication and Information Science. His research takes an interdisciplinary approach to understand collective phenomena on social media platforms. His recent work examined the co-existence of transactive and non-transactive utterances in issue-response networks and the emergence of novel socialities, such as instances of ‘momentary connectedness’, that function as extended domains of connectivity.
Dr. Daniel Suthers is Professor in the department of Information and Computer Sciences at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. His research is generally concerned with cognitive, social and computational perspectives on designing and evaluating software for learning, collaboration, and community, with a current focus on social affordances of digital media and network analytics. He is founding associate editor of the International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, and has chaired conferences on CSCL, Learning Analytics, and Computers in Education.