Social capital or liability? Gender, network size and self-rated health (SRH) among community-dwelling adults in Lao People’s Democratic Republic

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A3A2046566).

Highlights

•	Relationship between network size and SRH is examined.
•	Multilevel modeling is performed using primary data collected in Laos.
•	At the individual level, the network-health linkage is found to be negative.
•	For women only, this relationship is also shown at the contextual level.
•	Social capital may not always be functional for health.

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between social capital and health by focusing on a novel empirical case: Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR). Specifically, it examines individual- and community-level associations between network size and self-rated health (SRH) among community-dwelling Lao adults, and how gender may moderate those associations. Data come from the original survey (of 979 respondents in 50 villages) conducted in Laos in 2015. Using pooled and stratified subsets of data, we fitted a series of (2-level) hierarchical generalized linear models to investigate the network size-SRH linkage, while adjusting for confounders. Net of age, gender, ethnicity, partnership status, educational attainment, household economic background, life satisfaction, social support, and physical conditions (BMI and number of adverse bodily symptoms), we find that larger network size (number of confidants) is negatively related to SRH for both male and female subgroups. For the female subsample, residence in a “better-connected” community, characterized by greater aggregate network size, is also associated with lower odds of being healthy. No such contextual-level effect exists for men.

Keywords:

• Social capital
• Network size
• Self-rated health
• Contextual effect
• Lao PDR

Notes

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A3A2046566).