12
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Randomized controlled trials in psychiatry. Part II: their relationship to clinical practice

, , &
Pages 265-269 | Received 13 Dec 2002, Accepted 13 Dec 2002, Published online: 07 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the extent to which the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in psychiatry can be generalized to clinical practice.

Method: Threats to internal and external validity in psychiatric RCTs are reviewed.

Results: Threats to internal validity increase the possibility of bias. Psychiatric RCTs have problems with small samples, arbitrary definitions of caseness, disparate definitions of outcome and high spontaneous recovery rates. Particular issues arise in psychotherapy RCTs. Threats to external validity reduce the extent to which the results of a RCT produce a correct basis for generalization to other circumstances. These include high rates of comorbidity and sub syndromal pathology in normal clinical practice, manual-based treatment protocols and varying definitions of successful treatment.

Conclusions: Randomized controlled trials remain the most robust design to investigate the effectiveness of treatments. They should be applied to important clinical questions; and carried out, as far as possible, with typical patients in the clinical conditions in which the treatment is likely to be used.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.