Endoscopic ultrasound guided versus surgical transrectal drainage of pelvic abscesses

Abstract

Background: Pelvic abscesses are common but only small case series reporting outcome of either endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided or surgical transrectal drainage have been reported.

Methods: We performed a retrospective consecutive cohort study, assessing effectivity and safety of EUS guided or surgical transrectal drainage of previously untreated pelvic abscesses from all causes, diagnosed using CT scan between 09/2010 and 06/2014 in a Dutch teaching hospital.

Results: Forty-six patients with comparable demographics, apart from stoma presence (p = .016), were included. The success rate after a single intervention was 83% in the EUS guided compared to 48% in the surgical transrectal drainage group (p = .013). However, the mean duration of drainage was threefold in the EUS group [42 versus 13 days (p = .001)]. The length of stay in hospital was similar for both EUS and surgical group [24 versus 20 days (p = .56)] as was abscess resolution during follow-up [78% versus 74%]. We recorded a total of 12 anastomotic leaks [3 versus 9]. In the occurrence of leakage, only one stoma was finally closed in each group.

Conclusion: EUS guided and surgical transrectal drainage of pelvic abscesses from any cause are safe, nonetheless EUS guided drainage(if feasible) seems more effective after a single treatment, with high overall cure rates.

Keywords:

• Pelvic abscess
• endoscopic ultrasound
• transrectal surgery
• drainage

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.