11
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1

, &
Pages 1138-1141 | Received 19 Jan 2004, Published online: 03 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Background. The development of new diagnostic and surgical methods has brought a differentiated approach to the surgery of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to verify the peri- and postoperative differences between laparoscopic and open procedures. Methods. In the period from January 1995 to August 2001 a total of 86 patients were treated for endometrial cancer stage 1. Of these, 28 patients were treated by laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), while 58 patients were treated by total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and BSO. The two patient groups were comparable in all aspects. Results. The average hospital stay in the LAVH group was 2.7 days compared to 5.4 days for the TAH group. There were fewer complications in the LAVH group (7%) compared to the laparotomy group (14%). Conclusions. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy seems to be acceptable in the treatment of stage 1 endometrial carcinoma.

Acronyms
TAH=

total abdominal hysterectomy

LAVH=

laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy

BSO=

bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

BMI=

body mass index.

Acronyms
TAH=

total abdominal hysterectomy

LAVH=

laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy

BSO=

bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

BMI=

body mass index.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.