Do in vitro solubility studies on endodontic sealers demonstrate a high level of evidence? A systematic review

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the quality of evidence of available in vitro solubility studies on endodontic sealers according to prespecified evidence criteria.

Material and methods: This systematic review was based on the PRISMA guidelines and the AMSTAR measurement tool. A systematic duplicate search of the literature on endodontic sealer solubility studies was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases (until 18 October 2017). Mapping terms to subject headings and free text terms were used and combined with hand searching before exclusion of duplicates. Studies specifically dealing with endodontic sealer solubility were selected. The evidence level was graded (low, medium or high) independently by two investigators following systematic data extraction in pilot forms, which was based on prespecified evidence criteria and the modified CONSORT checklist for in vitro studies on dental materials.

Results: The search retrieved 1053 articles, from which 88 were assessed in full. From the 63 articles retained in the final analysis, 11 were classified as having moderate and 52 as low quality of evidence (0 high). The studies graded as low had low sample size (n < 10) and/or insufficient details to allow replicability. Most of the studies did not conform to the modified CONSORT checklist and did not include parameters considered relevant in the prespecified criteria.

Conclusions: Existing in vitro studies on the solubility of endodontic sealers do not demonstrate a high quality of evidence. Most of these studies do not present systematic reporting nor employ relevant parameters prespecified in our evidence criteria.

Keywords:

• Endodontics
• in vitro techniques
• materials testing
• root canal filling materials

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences from the University of Copenhagen. Further support was obtained from the Danish Dental Association, the Danish Endodontic Society, and the Municipality of Furesø, Denmark.