Abstract
Lean and siscowet morphotypes of lake trout Salvelinus namaycush in Lake Superior are thought to be genetically separate, but the reproductive isolating mechanism is unknown. The testicular and ovarian cycles and reproductive hormone levels of these morphotypes were determined from May to October in populations east and west of the Keweenaw Peninsula in southern Lake Superior. The gonadosomatic index (GSI) increased from August to October for lean and siscowet males and females east of the Keweenaw Peninsula and for siscowets west of the Keweenaw Peninsula. Circulating estradiol-17β (E2) levels and ovarian GSIs increased simultaneously in females of both morphotypes. However, circulating 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) levels in lean and siscowet males were not significantly elevated until October even though testicular GSIs increased by August. Transcripts of the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) beta subunit (an indirect measure of FSH activity) increased in lean and siscowet males and females during August and September, when GSIs were increasing for both morphotypes. The seasonal changes in GSIs and hormone levels indicate that both lean and siscowet individuals in southern Lake Superior populations undergo reproductive maturation at the same time in the fall; therefore, reproductive timing does not appear to genetically isolate the morphotypes in these populations. A proportion of the sampled females (lean lake trout: 54%; siscowets: 42%) exhibited no increase in GSI from August to October, strongly suggesting that in any given year some proportion of the population does not reproduce. This was also observed in males but at a lower percentage (19–20%). Fish that did not have maturing gonads from August to October also had lower E2 and 11-KT levels than maturing fish. Fecundity measured for lean and siscowet lake trout was not statistically different and was similar to historical values.
Received November 13, 2010; accepted May 26, 2011
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The crews of the R/V Judy and R/V Lake Char, including Brandon Bastar, Dawn Dupras, Greg Kleaver, Helen Morales, Kevin Rathbun, Dan Traynor, and Tim Wille, worked extremely hard in the field collection of fish for this study. Henry Quinlan and Mark Brouder (Ashland Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) and Bill Mattes (Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission) provided additional and essential field support for collections. This study was supported by a grant from the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (to F.G., S.S., and C.B.) and by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Project F-81-R). The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Reference to trade names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.