741
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

The Swimming and Jumping Ability of Three Small Great Plains Fishes: Implications for Fishway Design

, &
Pages 1521-1531 | Received 18 Aug 2010, Accepted 06 May 2011, Published online: 05 Dec 2011
 

Abstract

There is a distinct need for fishway designs that are passable by small-bodied fishes. Like many lotic systems worldwide, the streams of the North American Great Plains are frequently fragmented by instream structures and other potential migration barriers. This makes small-bodied fishes of the North American Great Plains appropriate species to use for fishway development. The swimming and jumping abilities of brassy minnow Hybognathus hankinsoni, Arkansas darters Etheostoma cragini, and common shiners Luxilus cornutus, acclimated to water temperatures of 10, 17.5, and 25°C, were quantified in the laboratory. Endurance increased with temperature for brassy minnow but not for the other two species. Based on swimming trial results, current velocities in fishways should not exceed 64 cm/s for brassy minnow or common shiners and 32 cm/s for Arkansas darters. Jumping experiments showed that the presence of a low vertical barrier (5 cm high) dramatically reduced the probability of upstream movement of all three species. Brassy minnow jumped a maximum of 15 cm at 25°C, and common shiners jumped a maximum of 10 cm at 17.5°C. Neither species jumped at 10°C. Arkansas darters did not jump at any temperature. Behavioral observations also indicated that a submerged weir may inhibit the upstream movement of Arkansas darters. Based on the results of this laboratory study, water velocities of less than 0.75 m/s and avoidance of fishways with vertical drops or weir-type structures will increase the probability of successful passage of small-bodied fishes.

Received August 18, 2010; accepted May 6, 2011

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank M. Jones, K. Kehmeier, J. Marrinan, T. Nesler, D. Schnoor, and R. Van Buren (Colorado Division of Wildlife); M. Hill, J. Rietz, and J. zumBrunnen (Colorado State University [CSU]); and L. Hansen (World Wildlife Fund) for technical and administrative assistance with the project. Three anonymous reviewers and members of the CSU Fish Physiological Ecology Laboratory provided useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Project funding was provided by the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the World Wildlife Fund, the Colorado State University Water Center, and the National Science Foundation Research Experience for Undergraduates Program. All research in this project was conducted with the approval of the Colorado State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol numbers 03-324A-O2 and 03-125A-01).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.