559
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Barriers Impede Upstream Spawning Migration of Flathead Chub

, , , , &
Pages 17-25 | Received 12 Mar 2013, Accepted 02 Jul 2013, Published online: 11 Dec 2013
 

Abstract

Many native cyprinids are declining throughout the North American Great Plains. Some of these species require long reaches of contiguous, flowing riverine habitat for drifting eggs or larvae to develop, and their declining populations have been attributed to habitat fragmentation or barriers (e.g., dams, dewatered channels, and reservoirs) that restrict fish movement. Upstream dispersal is also needed to maintain populations of species with passively drifting eggs or larvae, and prior researchers have suggested that these fishes migrate upstream to spawn. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a mark–recapture study of Flathead Chub Platygobio gracilis within a 91-km reach of continuous riverine habitat in Fountain Creek, Colorado. We measured CPUE, spawning readiness (percent of Flathead Chub expressing milt), and fish movement relative to a channel-spanning dam. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that Flathead Chub migrate upstream to spawn during summer. The CPUE was much higher at the base of the dam than at downstream sites; the seasonal increases in CPUE at the dam closely tracked seasonal increases in spawning readiness, and marked fish moved upstream as far as 33 km during the spawning run. The upstream migration was effectively blocked by the dam. The CPUE of Flathead Chub was much lower upstream of the OHDD than at downstream sites, and <0.2% of fish marked at the dam were recaptured upstream. This study provides the first direct evidence of spawning migration for Flathead Chub and supports the general hypothesis that barriers limit adult dispersal of these and other plains fishes.

Received March 12, 2013; accepted July 2, 2013

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the numerous Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife (CPW) personnel for assistance in data collection and management; K. Bestgen, C. Hoagstrom, and G. Wilde for reviewing this manuscript; and B. Cade for statistical advice. This research was funded by CPW and by a grant from the Colorado Water Conservation Board to the Fountain Creek Flood Control and Greenways District. This research was subjected to U.S. Geological Survey review and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.