Abstract
Researchers have cautioned against the borrowing of consumption and growth parameters from other species and life stages in bioenergetics growth models. In particular, the function that dictates temperature dependence in maximum consumption (Cmax) within the Wisconsin bioenergetics model for Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha produces estimates that are lower than those measured in published laboratory feeding trials. We used published and unpublished data from laboratory feeding trials with subyearling Chinook Salmon from three stocks (Snake, Nechako, and Big Qualicum rivers) to estimate and adjust the model parameters for temperature dependence in Cmax. The data included growth measures in fish ranging from 1.5 to 7.2 g that were held at temperatures from 14°C to 26°C. Parameters for temperature dependence in Cmax were estimated based on relative differences in food consumption, and bootstrapping techniques were then used to estimate the error about the parameters. We found that at temperatures between 17°C and 25°C, the current parameter values did not match the observed data, indicating that Cmax should be shifted by about 4°C relative to the current implementation under the bioenergetics model. We conclude that the adjusted parameters for Cmax should produce more accurate predictions from the bioenergetics model for subyearling Chinook Salmon.
Received May 20, 2014; accepted November 5, 2014
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Detailed laboratory data used in these evaluations were part of the master's thesis of J. Yanke; the modeling analyses were part of the doctoral dissertation of J. Plumb at the University of Idaho. Funding for the project was provided by the Bonneville Power Administration (D. Docherty, project officer). We thank the following people at the University of Idaho for assistance in laboratory trials: K. Anlauf, M. Colvin, T. Johnson, M. Santora, K. Stout, D. Stumbo, C. Smith, H. Vander Zanden, J. Evavold, B. Sun, and C. Hoffman. We also thank D. A. Beauchamp for reviewing earlier drafts of this manuscript. Gratitude is extended to W. P. Connor, K. F. Tiffan, R. W. Perry, and D. W. Rondorf for their suggested improvements. Data from the University of Idaho were collected in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Protocol 2003-09. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.