309
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Responses of Coastal Largemouth Bass to Episodic Hypoxia

, &
Pages 655-666 | Received 26 Aug 2014, Accepted 24 Feb 2015, Published online: 29 May 2015
 

Abstract

The river systems inhabited by coastal populations of Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides in North Carolina and along the Atlantic and Gulf coast regions exhibit episodic (i.e., several times per year) fluctuations in environmental conditions (e.g., dissolved oxygen [DO]). Laboratory studies have documented the effects of low DO (hypoxia) on Largemouth Bass, yet few field studies have examined these effects in open systems. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of episodic hypoxia on Largemouth Bass distribution, survival, and feeding success in an open coastal system. We collected 45 Largemouth Bass from four tributaries of the Chowan River and tagged them with acoustic transmitters. Fish movements were monitored using active tracking and passive receivers, and these data were compared with DO levels recorded in the tributaries and main-stem Chowan River. We found that tagged Largemouth Bass exhibited avoidance behavior at DO concentrations below 1.8 mg/L, with some seeking higher DO in the main stem or near tributary mouths during hypoxic events in the tributaries. The natural mortality rate of Largemouth Bass was low compared with rates reported in other studies, indicating that Largemouth Bass in coastal systems are able to survive hypoxic events. Analysis of stomach contents collected during hypoxic and non-hypoxic periods indicated that Largemouth Bass had less food in their stomachs under hypoxic conditions; however, the CPUE (fish/h of pedal time) of potential prey fishes was not lower during hypoxic periods relative to non-hypoxic periods, and thus a change in foraging opportunities did not appear to drive Largemouth Bass movement.

Received August 26, 2014; accepted February 24, 2015

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission through Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Grant F-100-R. We thank the following for their collaboration: K. J. Dockendorf, J. W. McCargo, and B. R. Ricks (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission); M. Loeffler and C. Rountree (North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources); and J. E. Hightower (North Carolina State University). We are grateful to the members of the Fisheries Ecology and Aquatic Sciences Laboratory at North Carolina State University for their assistance with field collections, and we thank two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful suggestions.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.