Theoretical Arguments in Debate Rounds: Toward a Justification

Abstract

Debates focusing on questions of debate theory have become increasingly more common. While some judges and coaches bemoan the presence of theoretical arguments in debate rounds, the present essay seeks to provide a justification for the practice. Specifically, the essay 1) offers arguments in favor of condoning theoretical arguments, 2) answers objections raised by critics of theoretical arguments, and 3) recommends standards for improving the quality of theoretical arguments. Given that a return to a unified theory of debate is unlikely in the foreseeable future, teaching debaters how to argue about theoretical issues is viewed as the best approach for dealing with the prevailing climate of theoretical pluralism.