86
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Edward Milne's influence on modern cosmology

Pages 471-481 | Received 25 Oct 2005, Published online: 02 Feb 2007
 

Summary

During the 1930 and 1940s, the small world of cosmologists was buzzing with philosophical and methodological questions. The debate was stirred by Edward Milne's cosmological model, which was deduced from general principles that had no link with observation. Milne's approach was to have an important impact on the development of modern cosmology. But this article shows that it is an exaggeration to intimate, as some authors have done recently, that Milne's rationalism went on to infiltrate the discipline.

I would like to thank Danny Yee and Jennifer Yee for help with my English.

Notes

1When we mention these authors without speaking of one in particular, we will use the expression ‘Gale and co.’

2George Gale, ‘Rationalist Programmes in Early Modern Cosmology’, The Astronomy Quarterly, 8 (1991), 193–218. George Gale, ‘Philosophical Aspects of the Origin of Modern Cosmology’ in Encyclopedia of Cosmology, edited by Norris S. Herherington (London, 1993), 481–495. George Gale and John Urani, ‘Philosophical midwifery and the birthpangs of modern cosmology’, American Journal of Physcis, 61 (1993), 66–73. John Urani and George Gale, ‘E. A. Milne and the Origins of Modern Cosmology: An Essential Presence’, in The Attraction of Gravitation: New Studies in the History of General Relativity (Einstein Studies, vol. 5), edited by John Earman, Michel Janssen and John D. Norton (Boston, 1993), 390–419. George Gale and Niall Shanks, ‘Methodology and the Birth of Modern Cosmological Inquiry’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27 (1996), 279–296. George Gale and John Urani, ‘Milne, Bondi and the ‘Second Way’ to Cosmology’, in The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity (Einstein Studies, vol. 7), edited by H. Goenner, J. Renn, J. Ritter and T. Sauer (Boston, 1999), 343–375. George Gale, 2002, ‘Cosmology: Methodological Debates in the 1930s and 1940s’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2002 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/cosmology-30s/), 2002), 1–18.

3See, in particular, George Gale and John Urani, 1993 (note 2).

4Edward Arthur Milne, ‘World Structure and the Expansion of the Universe’, Nature, 130 (1932), 9–10.

5Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold, ‘The Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 108 (1948), 252–270.

6Allen J. Harder, ‘E. A. Milne, Scientific Revolutions and the Growth of Knowledge’, Annals of Science, 31 (1974), 351–363.

7In particular, in John Urani and George Gale (note 2).

8George Gale, 1993 (note 2), 492.

9George Gale and John Urani, 1993 (note 2), 72.

10George Gale and Niall Shanks (note 2), 291.

11Edward Arthur Milne, ‘Cosmological Theories’, The Astrophysical Journal, 91 (1940), 129–158, 133.

12Edward Arthur Milne, ‘World-Structure and the Expansion of the Universe’, Zeitschrift für Astrophysik, 6 (1933), 1–95.

13Herbert Dingle, ‘On E. A. Milne's Theory of World Structure and the Expansion of the Universe’, Zeitschrift für Astrophysik, 6 (1933), 167–179.

14Herbert Dingle (note 13), 167.

15Herbert Dingle (note 13), 179.

16Herbert Dingle (note 13), 178.

17Herbert Dingle (note 13), 178.

18Herbert Dingle (note 13), 179.

22Herbert Dingle (note 19), 784.

19Herbert Dingle, ‘Modern Aristotelianism’, Nature, 139 (1937a), 784–786.

20Edward Arthur Milne, ‘Kinematics, Dynamics, and the Scale of Time’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A, 158 (1937a), 329.

21Herbert Dingle (note 19), 784.

23Herbert Dingle (note 19), 786.

27Arthur Stanley Eddington et al. (note 24), 1002.

24Arthur Stanley Eddington et al., ‘Physical Science and Philosophy’, Nature, 139 (1937), 1000–1010.

25Edward Arthur Milne, ‘On the Origin of Laws of Nature’, Nature, 139 (1937b), 997–999.

26Herbert Dingle, ‘Deductive and Inductive Methods in Science: A Reply’, Nature, 139 (1937b), 1011–1012.

28Herbert Dingle (note 26), 1011.

29Herbert Dingle (note 26), 1011.

30Arthur Stanley Eddington et al. (note 24), 1002.

31Arthur Stanley Eddington et al. (note 24), 1003.

32Arthur Stanley Eddington et al. (note 24), 1006.

33Arthur Stanley Eddington et al. (note 24), 1004.

34Arthur Stanley Eddington et al. (note 24), 1005.

35George Temple, ‘Relativistic cosmology’, The Proceedings of the Physical Society, 51 (1939), 465–478.

36George Gale, 1993 (note 2), 492.

39Percy Howard Robertson, ‘On E. A. Milne's Theory of World-Structure’, Zeitschrift für Astrophysik, 6 (1933), 158.

37Arthur Stanley Eddington et al. (note 24), 1003.

38For example, Hermann Bondi, Cosmology (Cambridge, 1960 [1952]), 123–124.

40Edward Arthur Milne (note 11), 151.

43Albert Einstein (note 41), 167.

46Hermann Bondi, ‘Review of Cosmology’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 108 (1948), 107.

41Albert Einstein, ‘On the Method of Theoretical Physics’, Philosophy of Science, 1 (1934), 166.

42Albert Einstein (note 41), 167.

44Albert Einstein (note 41), 167.

45Albert Einstein, ‘Remarks to the Essays Appearing in this Collective Volume’, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp (Evanston, IL, 1949), 684.

47George Gale, 1991 (note 2), 215. George Gale and John Urani (note 2), 68.

48George Gale, 1993 (note 2), 493. George Gale and John Urani (note 2), 72. George Gale and Niall Shanks (note 2), 291. George Gale and John Urani, 1993 (note 2), 345–347.

49Richard Tolman, ‘Models of the Physical Universe’, Science, 75 (1932), 373.

50Edward Arthur Milne (note 11), 132.

53William Hunter McCrea (note 51), p. 137.

51William Hunter McCrea, ‘The Evolution of Theories of Space–Time and Mechanics’, Philosophy of Science, 6 (1939), 137–162.

52William Hunter McCrea (note 51), p. 137.

54William Hunter McCrea (note 51), p. 154.

55William Hunter McCrea (note 51), p. 154.

57Edmund Taylor Whittaker (note 56), 169.

56Edmund Taylor Whittaker, ‘Some Disputed Questions in the Philosophy of the Physical Sciences’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh A, 61 (1943), 166.

58Edmund Taylor Whittaker (note 56), 169.

59Edmund Taylor Whittaker (note 56), 172.

60Edmund Taylor Whittaker (note 56), 169.

61Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold (note 5).

62Hermann Bondi (note 38).

63In particular, in George Gale and John Urani, 1999 (note 2).

64Herbert Dingle, ‘On Science and Modern Cosmology’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 113 (1953), 403.

65George Cunliffe McVittie, ‘Rationalism Versus Empiricism in Cosmology’, Science, 133 (1961), 1231–1236.

66Helge Kragh, Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe (Princeton, NJ, 1996).

67Helge Kragh, ‘Cosmo-Physics in the Thirties: Towards a History of Dirac Cosmology’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 13 (1982), 69–108.

68Milton Munitz, ‘Scientific Method in Cosmology’, Philosophy of Science, 19 (1952), 108–130.

69Milton Munitz, (note 68), 118.

70Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, ‘Edward Arthur Milne: His Part in the Development of Modern Astrophysics’, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 21 (1980), 103.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 609.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.