The Rise and Decline of Colloid Science in North America, 1900–1935: The Neglected Dimension

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Notes

¹Milton Kerker, ‘The Svedberg and Molecular Reality’, Isis, 67 (1976), 190–216. R. Ruyssen, Uit de geschiedenis en evolutie van de kolloïdenleer (Brussels, 1976). John Servos, ‘A Disciplinary Program that Failed: Wilder D. Bancroft and the Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1896–1933’, Isis, 73, 1 (1982), 207–32. Boelie Elzen, ‘Two Ultracentrifuges: A Comparative Study of the Social Construction of Artefacts’, Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986), 621–2. Klaus Sühnel, ‘80 Jahre Kolloidchemie: Leben und Werk Wolfgang Ostwalds’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaft, Technik und Medizin, 26 (1989), 31–45. Charles Tanford and Jacqueline Reynolds, ‘Protein Chemists Bypass the Colloid/Macromolecule Debate’, Ambix, 46 (1999), 33–51.

²Andrew Ede, ‘When is a Tool not a Tool? Understanding the Role of Laboratory Equipment in the Early Colloidal Chemistry Laboratory’, Ambix, 40 (1993), 11–24; idem, ‘Colloids and Quantification: The Ultracentrifuge and its Transformation of Colloid Chemistry’, Ambix, 43 (1996), 32–45.