178
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exports and economic growth in Central and East European countries during transition

Pages 1819-1824 | Published online: 02 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

This paper quantifies the contribution of exports to economic growth in Central and East European countries (CEECs) during transition. Two theoretical models are examined: the first is based on an aggregate production function which includes exports as an additional ‘input’; while the second is based on a two-sector (exports and non-exports) model where exports provide positive externalities in non-export production. Each model is estimated with both fixed and random effects using panel data. Results show that the random effects model is preferred and that exports have a significant impact on economic growth.

Notes

For a comprehensive review of the export-growth literature, see Giles and Williams (Citation2000a, Citation2000b).

Export externalities exist which improve efficiency through better management, labour training and so on.

The two factor fixed effects model also includes time-specific dummies which model technical change. However, with annual data for 1994–1999, technical change is not expected to be a significant determinant of economic growth.

The two factor random effects model also includes a time-specific error component to model technical change.

Robust errors are not presented for the random effects model because of estimation problems (Greene, Citation2000, pp. 580–1).

The corresponding test for the model in EquationEquation 5 is

 = 88.70.

Both EquationEquations 2 and Equation5 were also estimated using two factor fixed and random effects models. Using fixed effects, the significance of the time dummies was tested using Wald tests and results show that

 = 0.96 for EquationEquation 2, and
 = 0.96 for EquationEquation 5; in each case the null that the coefficients associated with the time dummies are zero is not rejected. Similarly using random effects, estimates of the variances of the random, country and time errors are 16.160, 9.048 and 0.165 for EquationEquation 2, and 17.340, 8.412 and 0.139 for EquationEquation 5 both of which imply that time effects are relatively unimportant. Thus, technical change appears absent in CEECs between 1994–1999, as expected.

In comparison, Ram's (Citation1985) estimates of the

-coefficient for 73 less developed countries range from 0.094–0.148 using data for 1960–1977.

In comparison, Feder's (Citation1983) estimates of the social marginal products of investment in exports for 32 semi-industrialized less developed countries range from 0.226–0.289 using data for 1964–1973.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 387.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.