ABSTRACT
We consider an anisotropic -equation, with a parametric and superlinear reaction term. We show that for all small values of the parameter the problem has at least five nontrivial smooth solutions, four with constant sign and the fifth nodal (sign-changing). The proofs use tools from critical point theory, truncation and comparison techniques, and critical groups.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classifications:
1. Introduction
Let be a bounded domain with a -boundary . In this paper, we study the following anisotropic -equation In this problem, the exponent is Lipschitz continuous and . By , we denote the variable exponent (anisotropic) p-Laplacian, defined by The reaction of the problem is parametric, with being the parameter. The function is measurable in , continuous in . We assume that is -superlinear as () but without satisfying the usual in such cases Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition (the AR-condition for short). Our goal is to prove a multiplicity theorem for problem () providing sign information for all the solutions produced. Using variational tools from the critical point theory, together with suitable truncation and comparison techniques and also Morse Theory (critical groups), we show that for all small values of the parameter the problem has at least five nontrivial smooth solutions (four of constant sign and the fifth nodal (sign-changing)).
Theorem 1.1
If hypotheses hold, then there exists such that for all problem () has at least five nontrivial smooth solutions nodal.
Remark 1.1
The hypotheses and spaces are defined in the next section. We stress that the above multiplicity theorem provides sign information for all the solutions.
Anisotropic equations arise in a variety of models of physical processes. We mention the works of Bahrouni-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation1] (transonic flow problems), Ržička [Citation2] (electrorheological and magnetorheological fluids), Zhikov [Citation3] (nonlinear elasticity theory), and Agarwal-Alghamdi-Gala-Ragusa [Citation4], Ragusa-Tachikawa [Citation5] (double phase problems). Recently there have been some existence and multiplicity results for various types of -equations with nonstandard growth. We refer to the works of Gasiński-Papageorgiou [Citation6], Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation7], Rădulescu [Citation8], Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation9], Papageorgiou-Scapellato [Citation10], Papageorgiou-Vetro [Citation11], Zhang-Rădulescu [Citation12]. They produce at most three nontrivial solutions, but no nodal solutions. We also mention the recent isotropic works of Li-Rong-Liang [Citation13], Papageorgiou-Vetro-Vetro [Citation14] producing two positive solutions for - and -equations, respectively, and the recent work of Papageorgiou-Scapellato [Citation15] who consider a different class of parametric equations (superlinear perturbations of the standard eigenvalue problem) and produce seven solutions, all with sign information.
2. Mathematical background – hypotheses
The analysis of problem () requires the use of Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces with variable exponents. A comprehensive treatment of such spaces can be found in the book of Diening-Hajulehto-Hästö-Ržička [Citation16].
Given , we define Let and (as usual we identify two measurable functions which differ only on a Lebesgue null set). Given , we define the variable exponent Lebesgue space as follows This vector space is equipped with the so-called ‘Luxemburg norm’ defined by Then becomes a separable, uniformly convex (hence also reflexive) Banach space. The reflexivity of these spaces leads to the reflexivity of the corresponding Sobolev spaces, which we introduce below. In reflexive Banach spaces bounded sequences have w-convergent subsequences (Eberlein-Šmulian theorem). We will be using this fact repeatedly. The dual is given by with defined by for all (that is, for all ). Also we have the following version of Hölder's inequality If and for all , then continuously.
Now that we have variable exponent Lebesgue spaces, we can define variable exponent Sobolev spaces. So, if , then we define with being the weak gradient of u. This Sobolev space is equipped with the norm When is Lipschitz continuous (that is, ), then we define the Dirichlet anisotropic Sobolev space by Both spaces and are separable and uniformly convex (hence reflexive) Banach spaces.
If , then we define the critical Sobolev exponent corresponding to by setting Suppose that , and for all (resp. for all ). Then the anisotropic Sobolev embedding theorem says that The same embedding theorem remains true also for provided . Moreover, in this case the Poincaré inequality is true, namely, we can find such that This means that on the anisotropic Sobolev space we can consider the equivalent norm The following modular function is very helpful in the study of the anisotropic Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces. So, let . We define For , we define .
The modular function and the Luxemburg are closely related.
Proposition 2.1
If and then
(a) | for all we have | ||||
(b) |
| ||||
(c) | |||||
(d) |
Suppose that . We have Then we introduce the operator defined by The next proposition summarizes the main properties of this operator (see Gasiński-Papageorgiou [Citation17], Proposition 2.5, and Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation7], p. 40).
Proposition 2.2
If and is defined as above, then is bounded maps bounded sets to bounded sets continuous, strictly monotone hence also maximal monotone and of type that is, if in and then in
Given , we set . Then for , we define for all . We know that If are measurable functions such that for a.a. , then we define and .
We write if and only if for every compact , we have for a.a. . Evidently, if and for all , then .
Besides the anisotropic Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces, we will also use the ordered Banach space . The positive (order) cone of is . This cone has a nonempty interior given by with being the outward unit normal on .
Suppose X is a Banach space and . We set We say that satisfies the ‘C-condition’, if it has the following property:
‘Every sequence such that admits a strongly convergent subsequence’.
Given , we set .
Suppose . For every , by we denote the -singular homology group with integer coefficients for the pair . Let be isolated and . Then the critical groups of φ at u are defined by where U is an open neighborhood of u such that . The excision property of singular homology implies that this definition is independent of the choice of the isolating neighborhood U.
In the sequel, for economy in the notation, by we will denote the norm of the Sobolev space (). On account of the Poincaré inequality mentioned earlier, we have Now we are ready to introduce our hypotheses on the data of problem ().
: and for all .
: is a Carathéodory function such that for a.a. , and
for a.a. , all , with , with for all ;
if , then
there exists such that
there exists such that
for every , there exists such that for a.a. , the function is nondecreasing on and for every s>0, we have for a.a. , all .
Remark 2.1
Hypotheses imply that for a.a. , is -superlinear. However, this superlinearity condition on is not formulated using the AR-condition which is common in the literature when dealing with superlinear problems (see, for example, Fan-Deng [Citation18], Theorem 1.3). Instead we use condition which incorporates in our framework superlinear nonlinearities with slower growth as , which fail to satisfy the AR-condition. Consider for example the function with . This function satisfies hypotheses , but fails to satisfy the AR-condition. Hypothesis implies the presence of a concave term near zero.
3. Constant sign solutions - multiplicity
In this section, we show that for small, problem () has solutions of constant sign (positive and negative solutions). First we look for positive solutions. To this end, we introduce the -functional defined by Working with , we can produce multiple positive smooth solutions when is small.
Proposition 3.1
If hypotheses hold, then there exists such that for all problem () has at least two positive solutions .
Proof.
On account of hypotheses , we have (1) (1) Then for every , we have If , then by Proposition 2.1 and the Poincaré inequality, we have . Also recall that and continuously. Therefore, for with , we have (2) (2) Let and consider with . Then from (Equation2(2) (2) ) we have (3) (3) The choice of and since , imply that Hence we can find such that Then from (Equation3(3) (3) ) we see that (4) (4) Let denote the principal eigenvalue of the Dirichlet Laplacian and the corresponding positive, -normalized (that is, ) eigenfunction. We know that (see for example, Gasiński-Papageorgiou [Citation19], p. 739). On account of hypothesis , given , we can find such that (5) (5) Since , we can find small such that for all . Then (6) (6) Note that Therefore from (Equation6(6) (6) ), we have Since (see hypothesis ), choosing even smaller if necessary, we have (7) (7) Using the anisotropic Sobolev embedding theorem (see Section 2), we infer that is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. The ball is sequentially weakly compact (recall that is a reflexive Banach space and use the Eberlein-Šmulian theorem). So, by the Weierstrass-Tonelli theorem, we can find such that (8) (8) From (Equation7(7) (7) ) and (Equation8(8) (8) ), it follows that Moreover, from (Equation4(4) (4) ) and (Equation8(8) (8) ), we infer that (9) (9) From (Equation9(9) (9) ) we see that is an interior point in and a minimizer of . Hence (10) (10) In (Equation10(10) (10) ) we choose and obtain From (Equation10(10) (10) ), we have that is a positive solution of problem () with . From Fan-Zhao [Citation20, Theorem 4.1] (see also Gasiński-Papageorgiou [Citation6, Proposition 3.1]), we have that . Then from Tan-Fang [Citation21, Corollary 3.1] (see also Fukagai-Narukawa [Citation22, Lemma 3.3]), we have that . Finally, the anisotropic maximum principle of Zhang [Citation23] implies that .
Now let and consider . From the previous analysis, we know that problem has a positive solution . We will show that we can have (11) (11) First we will show that we can have a solution of such that . To this end let (12) (12) This is a Carathéodory function. We set and consider the -functional defined by From Proposition 2.1 and (Equation12(12) (12) ), we see that is coercive. Also, it is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. So, we can find such that (13) (13) As before, using hypothesis and choosing small so that we also have (see Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation24], Proposition 4.1.22, p. 274 and recall that ), we will have From (Equation13(13) (13) ) we have (14) (14) In (Equation14(14) (14) ), we choose and have Next in (Equation14(14) (14) ) we choose . We have So, we have proved that (15) (15) As before, from the anisotropic regularity theory and the anisotropic maximum principle, imply that . So, we have produced a solution of such that (see (Equation15(15) (15) )).
Now, let and let be as postulated by hypothesis . We have (16) (16) Recall that . So, on account of hypothesis , we have Then from (Equation16(16) (16) ) and Proposition 2.4 of Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation9], we infer that (Equation11(11) (11) ) is true.
Using , we introduce the following truncation of (17) (17) We set and consider the -functional defined by From (Equation17(17) (17) ), we see that (18) (18) From the first part of the proof, we know that is a local minimizer of . Then (Equation11(11) (11) ) and (Equation18(18) (18) ) imply that (19) (19) (see Tan-Fang [Citation21], Theorem 3.2 and Gasiński-Papageorgiou [Citation6], Proposition 3.3). Using (Equation17(17) (17) ), we can easily check that (20) (20) This implies that we may assume that (21) (21) (otherwise we already have a whole sequence of distinct positive smooth solutions of () and so we are done). Then (Equation21(21) (21) ), (Equation19(19) (19) ) and Theorem 5.7.6, p. 449, of Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation24], imply that we can find small such that (22) (22) If , then from hypothesis we have (23) (23) Moreover, (Equation18(18) (18) ) and Proposition 4.1 of Gasiński-Papageorgiou [Citation6], implies that (24) (24) From (Equation22(22) (22) )–(Equation24(24) (24) ), we see that we can use the mountain pass theorem and obtain such that (25) (25) From (Equation25(25) (25) ) and (Equation17(17) (17) ), it follows that is a positive solution of problem () (), .
In a similar fashion, we can generate two negative smooth solutions when is small. In this case, we start with the -functional defined by Using this functional and reasoning as in the ‘positive’ case, we have the following multiplicity result.
Proposition 3.2
If hypotheses hold, then there exists such that for all problem () has at least two negative solutions .
4. Extremal constant sign solutions
Let be the set of positive solutions of () and be the set of negative solutions of (). We know that: In this section, we show that has a smallest element , that is, for all and has a biggest element , that is, for all . We call and the ‘extremal’ constant sign solutions of (). In Section 5 these solutions will be used to produce a nodal (sign-changing) solution of (). Indeed, if we can produce a nontrivial solution of () in the order interval distinct from and , on account of the extremality of and , this solution will be nodal.
To produce the extremal constant sign solutions, we need some preparation. Let and let . On account of hypotheses , we can find such that (26) (26) This unilateral growth restriction on , leads to the following auxiliary anisotropic -problem For this problem, we have the following result
Proposition 4.1
If hypotheses hold, then for every problem () has a unique positive solution , and since problem () is odd, is the unique negative solution.
Proof.
Consider the -functional defined by Since , from this last inequality, we infer that is coercive. Also, it is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. So, we can find such that (27) (27) Let . We have From the choice of η, we see that Therefore, we can write that Since , taking even smaller if necessary, we have From (Equation27(27) (27) ) we have (28) (28) In (Equation28(28) (28) ), we choose and obtain Then from (Equation27(27) (27) ), we see that is a positive solution of (). As before (see the proof of Proposition 3.1), the anisotropic regularity theory and the anisotropic maximum principle, imply that Next we show the uniqueness of this positive solution. To this end, we consider the integral functional defined by From Theorem 2.2 Taká-Giacomoni [Citation25], we know that is convex. Let (the effective domain of ) and suppose is another positive solution of (). Again we have that . Hence using Proposition 4.1.22, p. 274, of Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation24], we have Let . Then for small, we have Thus the convexity of implies the Gateaux differentiability of at and at in the direction h. Moreover, a direct calculation using Green's identity (see also [Citation25], Theorem 2.5), gives The convexity of implies the monotonicity of . Hence This proves the uniqueness of the positive solution of (). Since the equation is odd, it follows that is the unique negative solution of (), .
The solution (resp. ), will provide a lower bound (resp. an upper bound) for the solution set (resp. ). These bounds are important in generating the extremal constant sign solutions.
Proposition 4.2
If hypotheses hold, then for all and for all .
Proof.
Let and consider the Carathéodory function defined by (29) (29) We set and consider the -functional defined by It follows that is coercive. Also, it is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. So, we can find such that (30) (30) As before (see the proof of Proposition 4.1), for small, we will have From (Equation30(30) (30) ), we have (31) (31) In (Equation31(31) (31) ), first we choose . We obtain Next in (Equation31(31) (31) ), we choose . We have So, we have proved that (32) (32) From (Equation32(32) (32) ), (Equation29(29) (29) ) and (Equation31(31) (31) ), we see that is a positive solution of (). Then Proposition 4.1 implies that Similarly we show that for all .
Now we are ready to produce the extremal constant sign solutions for problem (). Let .
Proposition 4.3
If hypotheses hold and , then problem () has a smallest positive solution and a biggest negative solution .
Proof.
From Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation26] (see the proof of Proposition 4.3), we have that is downward directed (that is, if , then we can find such that , ). Therefore using Lemma 3.10, p. 178, of Hu-Papageorgiou [Citation17], we can find decreasing such that We have (33) (33) (34) (34) In (Equation33(33) (33) ) we choose and obtain (35) (35) From (Equation34(34) (34) ), (Equation35(35) (35) ) and hypothesis , we infer that So, we may assume that (36) (36) In (Equation33(33) (33) ) we choose , pass to the limit as and use (Equation36(36) (36) ). We obtain (37) (37) Therefore, if in (Equation33(33) (33) ), we pass to the limit as and use (Equation37(37) (37) ), we obtain For the negative solutions, we know that is upward directed (that is, if , then we can find such that , ). Reasoning as above, we produce such that for all .
5. Nodal solutions
In this section using the extremal constant sign solutions and following the approach outlined in the beginning of Section 4, we will produce a nodal (sign-changing) solution for problem (), .
Let and be the two extremal constant sign solutions produced in Proposition 4.3. We introduce the Carathéodory function defined by (38) (38) We also consider the positive and negative truncations of , namely, the Carathéodory functions (39) (39) We set and , and then introduce the -functionals defined by Using (Equation38(38) (38) ) and (Equation39(39) (39) ) and arguing as in the proof of Proposition 4.2, since are the extremal constant sign solutions, we obtain the following proposition.
Proposition 5.1
If hypotheses hold and then , , .
The next result will allow the use of the mountain pass theorem.
Proposition 5.2
If hypotheses hold and then the two extremal constant sign solutions and are local minimizers of .
Proof.
From (Equation38(38) (38) ), (Equation39(39) (39) ) and hypothesis , we have Therefore Also, it is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. So, we can find such that Since , from Proposition 5.1, we infer that But from (Equation38(38) (38) ) and (Equation39(39) (39) ), it is clear that It follows that Similarly using this time , we show that is a local minimizer of .
It is clear from Proposition 5.1, that we may assume that (40) (40) Otherwise, we already have a sequence of distinct smooth nodal solutions of () and so we are done.
Also, we may assume that (41) (41) The reasoning is similar if the opposite inequality holds.
Proposition 5.3
If hypotheses hold and then the problem () has a nodal solution .
Proof.
From (Equation40(40) (40) ), (Equation41(41) (41) ) and Theorem 5.7.6, p. 449, of Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation24], we can find small such that (42) (42) Also is coercive (see (Equation38(38) (38) )). Hence Proposition 5.1.15, p. 369, of Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation24], implies that (43) (43) Then (Equation42(42) (42) ) and (Equation43(43) (43) ) permit the use of the mountain pass theorem. So, we can find such that (44) (44) From (Equation44(44) (44) ), (Equation38(38) (38) ) and (Equation42(42) (42) ), we infer that From Theorem 6.5.8, p. 527, of Papageorgiou-Rădulescu-Repovš [Citation24], we know that (45) (45) On the other hand, hypothesis and Proposition 4.2 of Leonardi-Papageorgiou [Citation27] imply that (46) (46) Comparing (Equation45(45) (45) ) and (Equation46(46) (46) ), we conclude that and so is a nodal solution of ().
This also proves Theorem 1.1.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank a knowledgeable referee for his/her constructive remarks and criticisms.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Funding
References
- Bahrouni A, Rădulescu VD, Repovš DD. Double phase transonic flow problems with variable growth: nonlinear patterns and stationary waves. Nonlinearity. 2019;32:2481–2495.
- Ržička M. Electrorheological fluids: modeling and mathematical theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2000. (Lecture Notes in Mathematics; 1748).
- Zhikov VV. On variational problems and nonlinear elliptic equations with nonstandard growth conditions. J Math Sci. 2011;173:463–570.
- Agarwal RP, Alghamdi AM, Gala S, et al. On the continuation principle of local smooth solution for the Hall-MHD equations. Appl Anal. 2020. 9 pp. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2020.1753711.
- Ragusa MA, Tachikawa A. Regularity for minimizers for functionals of double phase with variable exponents. Adv Nonlinear Anal. 2020;9:710–728.
- Gasiński L, Papageorgiou NS. Nonlinear analysis. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2006. (Series Mathematical Analysis and Applications; 9).
- Rădulescu VD, Repovš DD. Partial differential equations with variable exponents: variational methods and qualitative analysis. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2015.
- Rădulescu VD, Isotropic and anisotropic double-phase problems: old and new. Opuscula Math. 2019;39:259–279.
- Papageorgiou NS, Rădulescu VD, Repovš DD. Nonlinear analysis – theory and methods. In: Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham; 2019.
- Papageorgiou NS, Scapellato A. Positive solutions for singular (p,q)-equations. Z Angew Math Phys. 2020;71:155.
- Papageorgiou NS, Vetro C. Superlinear (p(z),q(z))-equations. Complex Var Elliptic Equ. 2019;64:8–25.
- Zhang Q, Rădulescu VD. Double phase anisotropic variational problems and combined effects of reaction and absorption terms. J Math Pures Appl. 2018;118:159–203.
- Li F, Rong T, Liang Z. Multiple positive solutions for a class of (2,p)-Laplacian equation. J Math Phys. 2018;59:121506.
- Papageorgiou NS, Vetro C, Vetro F. Solutions and positive solutions for superlinear Robin problems. J Math Phys. 2019;60:101506.
- Papageorgiou NS, Scapellato A. Constant sign and nodal solutions for parametric (p,2)-equations. Adv Nonlinear Anal. 2020;9:449–478.
- Diening L, Harjulehto P, Hästö P, et al. Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces with variable exponents. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011. (Lecture Notes in Mathematics; 2017).
- Hu S, Papageorgiou NS. Handbook of multivalued analysis, Vol I: theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997.
- Fan X, Deng S-G. Multiplicity of positive solutions for a class of inhomogeneous Neumann problems involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Differ Equ Appl NoDEA. 2009;16:255–271.
- Gasiński L, Papageorgiou NS. Anisotropic nonlinear Neumann problems. Calc Var. 2011;42:323–354.
- Fan X, Zhao D. A class of De Giorgi type and Hölder continuity. Nonlinear Anal. 1999;36:295–318.
- Tan Z, Fang F. Orlicz-Sobolev versus Hölder local minimizer and multiplicity results for quasilinear elliptic equations. J Math Anal Appl. 2013;402:348–370.
- Fukagai N, Narukawa K. On the existence of multiple positive solutions of quasilinear elliptic eigenvalue problems. Ann Mat Pura Appl. 2007;186:539–564.
- Zhang Q. A strong maximum principle for differential equations with nonstandard p(x)-growth conditions. J Math Anal Appl. 2005;312:24–32.
- Papageorgiou NS, Rădulescu VD, Repovš DD. Positive solutions for perturbations of the Robin eigenvalue problem plus an indefinite potential. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2017;37:2589–2618.
- Takáč P, Giacomoni J. A p(x)-Laplacian extension of the Díaz-Saa inequality and some applications. Proc R Soc Edinburgh Sec A. 2019;150:205–232.
- Papageorgiou NS, Rădulescu VD, Repovš DD. Anisotropic equations with indefinite potential and competing nonlinearities. Nonlinear Anal. 2020;201:111861.
- Leonardi S, Papageorgiou NS. On a class of critical Robin problems. Forum Math. 2020;32:95–109.