Managing risk while translating research outcomes into design and construction innovation

ABSTRACT

Significant tension can exist between the goals of architectural research and of architectural and building practice. Worthwhile research involves generating risks its benefits are uncertain and require interpretation in practice as new design approaches or construction methods. In contrast, professional practice generally involves managing building procurement risk. This can encourage participants to resist change and enhance solution reliability, even if this delivers less than optimal performance. Practitioners can be innovative but often only through incremental development, nudging participants along the path to increasingly innovative action. As they do, the capability, capacity and confidence risks associated with novel design solutions need identification, assessment and response. These concepts are discussed in relation to a university-based case study, where researchers joined architectural practitioners in a design team for the design and delivery of a 120-unit student accommodation building. Finished in early 2016, the solution included novel timber-rich prefabrication and assembly techniques.

KEYWORDS:

• Innovation
• risk
• risk management
• timber construction
• prefabrication
• prototyping

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Morrison & Breytenbach Architects, Circa Morris-Nunn Architects, Dr Jon Shanks and Hutchinson Builders and students in the 2017 Advanced Design Research elective, Design that builds industry skill and capacity for the UTAS Masters in Architecture degree: Ying Bai, Samuel Collins, Thomas Gillie, Gloria Lau, Kwan Law, Kade Lovell, James Lucas, and Alex Wong.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.