708
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Perching behaviour and perch height preference of laying hens in furnished cages varying in height

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 381-389 | Accepted 20 Feb 2008, Published online: 14 Aug 2008
 

Abstract

1. The objective was to investigate the effect of cage height on perch height preference and perching behaviour in laying hens. Twelve groups of two hens and 12 groups of 14 hens were tested in furnished cages equipped with two wooden perches. These stepwise perches were designed such that hens could choose between 7 different heights (6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31 and 36 cm). Day- and night-time perching behaviour was observed on 4 consecutive days with a different cage height each day: 150, 55, 50 and 45 cm.

2. Given that a minimum perch–roof distance of 19 to 24 cm was available, hens preferred to roost on the highest perches at night.

3. Lowering cage height not only forced hens to use lower perches, but also reduced time spent on the perches during the day (two-hen and 14-hen test) and night (14-hen test). Moreover, it affected daytime behavioural activities (more standing and less preening) on the perches in the two-hen tests (but not in the 14-hen tests).

4. During the day lower perches were used more for standing and walking, higher perches more for sitting and sleeping. This behavioural differentiation was most pronounced in the highest cages.

5. Perch preference and perching behaviour depend on both the floor–perch distance and the perch–roof distance. Higher cages provide more opportunity for higher perches (which hens prefer), for better three-dimensional spacing (and consequently reduced density at floor level) and for behavioural differentiation according to perch height.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Federal Ministry of Public Health, Safety of the Food Chain and the Environment (project number S-6114). We thank Els Van Poucke for helping with the behavioural analysis and Thijs Decroos for the drawing of the (pre)-test cage. The authors are also grateful to the staff of the Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research for taking care of the laying hens and for their technical assistance.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 169.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.