Influence of protein concentration on the sulphur‐containing amino acid requirement of broiler chickens¹

Supported by State and Hatch funds allocated to the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Georgia.

Abstract

1. Two experiments were conducted with male broiler chickens from 3 to 6 weeks of age to determine the effect of dietary protein content on the requirement for sulphur amino acids (SAA). In experiment 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 g DL‐methionine/kg were added to diets calculated to contain 200, 240 or 280 g protein/kg. In experiment 2, 0, 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 g DL‐methionine/kg were added to diets calculated to contain 160, 180 or 200 g protein/kg.

2. In experiment 1, the SAA requirement for body weight gain increased as dietary protein content increased. Regression analysis indicated a requirement of 38 g SAA/kg protein.

3. In experiment 2 in which lysine supplementation provided a minimum of 10 g/kg, the requirement for SAA per unit of diet increased only slightly as protein concentration increased indicating that below 200 g protein/kg of diet, the SAA requirement increases per unit of protein with supplementation of the second‐limiting amino acid.

4. Abdominal fat percentage declined in a linear manner with each increment of SAA added to diets containing 160 to 200 g protein/kg. Adding methionine to diets containing 240 or 280 g protein/kg did not affect abdominal fat content. A lower limit of abdominal fat was achieved with a protein concentration of 240 g/kg.

5. It is concluded that the requirement for SAA of finishing broiler chickens is directly related to protein content at concentrations of 200 or more g protein/kg but increases per unit of protein at lower protein concentrations when a minimum lysine concentration is specified. Abdominal fat content reaches a minimum between 200 and 240 g protein/kg of a maize‐soyabean meal diet regardless of SAA content.

Notes

On leave from Faculdade de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia da Universidade de Sao Paulo and financially supported by Conselho de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico‐CNPq and Fundacao de Ampara a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo‐FAPESP, Brazil.

To whom reprint requests should be sent.

Supported by State and Hatch funds allocated to the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Georgia.