The rise of Firefox in the web browser industry: The role of open source in setting standards

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a continuous erosion of the Microsoft Internet Explorer share in the web browser market, mainly induced by the continuous gains of Mozilla Firefox, an open source software product. This tendency would seem to contradict the well-established belief that in a standards battle ‘the strong grow stronger while the weak grow weaker’. The objective of this study is to explain the evolution of web browsers through the analysis of the competitive relationship between the main players in this ongoing battle. We examine two standards battles: first, Netscape versus Microsoft, followed by the more recent battle between Microsoft and Mozilla. The analysis contributes to the understanding of standard battles in the context of open source software. It will be argued that some characteristics of Open Source Firefox, such as the semi-open development approach and the involvement of commercial companies, partially explain the rise of this web browser. Lock-in mechanisms, which historically have been reported to be dominant factors in standards battles, seem to have little impact in the context of open source software.

Keywords:

• Firefox
• Internet Explorer
• open source software
• web browsers
• setting standards

Notes

 1.  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7593106.stm (2008, September 2).

 2.  http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpmr=40&qpdt=1&qpct=3&qptimeframe=M, NetApplications (2009, November 1).

 3. See Egyedi and van Wendel de Joode (2004) for a detailed overview of standardisation in OSS development theory on (positive) ‘network effects’.

 4.  http://searchwindevelopment.techtarget.com/sDefinition/,,sid8_gci211708,00.html

 5. Not to be confused with the World Wide Web (WWW, also nicknamed Internet) that also was created by Berners-Lee.

 6. R. Cailliau (n.d.), A little history on the world wide web, retrieved from http://www.w3.org/History.htm

 7. The National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), based at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, aims, according to its website ( http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu) to be a leader in the development and deployment of new computing and software technologies for the scientific and engineering community. Special emphasis is placed on the development of a (national) cyber-infrastructure for science and engineering.

 8. B. Ives & S. Jarvenpaa (1994), What is the Internet and the world wide web? Virtualschool.edu, retrieved from http://virtualschool.edu/mon/CaseStudies/WebCase/www.html

 9.  http://biztech.ericsink.com/Browser_Wars.html

10. An extensive description of how Microsoft initially did not recognise the potential of the Internet can be found in Business Week's ‘Inside Microsoft’ article of 15 July 1996.

11.  http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers

12.  http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/history/ie.htm

13.  http://www.holgermetzger.de/Netscape_History.html

14. CSS: Cascading Styling Sheets: A language that allows programmer separate the visual definition of a web page from its content.

15. VBScript: Visual Basic Scripting Edition: An interpreted script language from Microsoft that is a subset of its Visual Basic programming language.

16.  http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers

17.  http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/history/ie.htm

18.  http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers

19. Document Object Model (DOM) is a ‘browser-neutral application programming interface (API) that lets web authors use scripts to automatically update parts of a Web page with fresh information’ (CNET News, 2004, April 7).

20.  http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers

21.  http://www.quirksmode.org/browsers

22. CNET News (2003, January 9), W3C releases scripting standard, caveat, retrieved from http://news.com.com/2100-1023-979976.html

23. W3Schools.com, http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

24. Cornell University, http://iws.cit.cornell.edu/iws2/technology/techinfo.cfm

25.  http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Disclosures

26.  http://www.holgermetzger.de/Netscape_History.html

27. For an elaborate description of (events prior to) the source code release, see J. Hamerly, T. Paquin & S. Walton (1999), Freeing the source: The story of Mozilla, retrieved from http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/netrev.html

28.  http://www.catb.org/%7Eesr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ar01s13.html

29. CNET News (2002, January 22), AOL's Netscape sues Microsoft, retrieved from http://news.com.com/2100-1001-820227.html

30. CNET News.com (2003, July 15), AOL lays off Netscape developers, retrieved from http://news.com.com/AOL+lays+off+Netscape+developers/2100-1032_3-1026078. html

31. CNET News (2003, October 15), With update, Mozilla introduces fees, retrieved from http://news.com.com/2100-1032-5091869.html

32. Arstechnica (2004, November 9), Firefox hits the big 1.0, retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20041109-4387.html

33. J. McHugh (2005), The Firefox explosion, Wired Magazine, 13.02, retrieved from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.02/firefox.html?pg=2&topic=firefox&topic_set

34. CNET News (2003, January 14), Apple snub stings Mozilla, retrieved from http://news.com.com/Apple+snub+stings+Mozilla/2100-1023_3-980492.html?tag=nl

35. P. Festa (2004, December), Browsers: A return to arms. The year in review, CNET News, retrieved from http://news.com.com/Year+in+review+Browser+wars,+part+2/2009-1032_3-5495797.html

36. Retrieved November 26, 2007, from www.mozilla.org/mission.html

37. J. Hamerly, T. Paquin, & S. Walton (1999), Freeing the source: The story of Mozilla, retrieved from http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/netrev.html

38. M. Baker (2004), The Mozilla Project and mozilla.org, retrieved from http://www.mozilla.org/editorials/mozilla-overview.html

39. J. McHugh (2005), The Firefox explosion, Wired Magazine, 13.02, retrieved from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.02/firefox.html?pg=2&topic=firefox&topic_set

40. CNET News (2005, September 21), Fix in for Firefox bugs, retrieved from http://news.com.com/Fix+in+for+Firefox+bugs/2100-1002_3-5875797.html?tag=nl

41. J. Rapoza (2004, November 9), Firefox 1.0 lives up to hype, eWeek, retrieved from http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1722370,00.asp,1895,1722370,00.asp

42. http://www-archive.mozilla.org/reorganization/

43. M. Baker (2004), The Mozilla Project and mozilla.org, retrieved from http://www. mozilla.org/editorials/mozilla-overview.html

44. S. Lohr & J. Markoff (2004, November 15). In the battle of the browsers '04, Firefox aims at Microsoft, New York Times, retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/15/technology/15browser.html

45. CNET News (2003, October 15), With update, Mozilla introduces fees, retrieved from http://news.com.com/2100-1032-5091869.html

46. http://www-archive.mozilla.org/press/mozilla-2005-08-03.html

47. G. Keizer (2007, November 14), Fix Firefox's memory problems, says Mozilla director, Linuxworld, retrieved from http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;2067098313;fp; 4;fpid;4

48. BBC.com (2004, November 9), Firefox browser takes on Microsoft, retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3993959.stm

49. CNET News (2004, November 11), Google stars in Firefox's new browser, retrieved from http://news.com.com/Google+stars+in+Firefoxs+new+browser/2100-1032_3-5449172. html

50.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox (2010, January 15).

51.  http://www.pcworld.com/article/167862/microsoft_keeps_beating_a_dead_browser.html (2009, July 3).

52.  http://www.aspfree.com/c/a/BrainDump/Microsoft-Internet-Explorer-8-Mixed-Reactions (2009, April 14).

53. G. Keiser (2009, March 23), IE8 gains market share at Microsoft own expense, ComputerWorld, retrieved from http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9130221/IE8_ gains_market_share_at_Microsoft_s_own_expense?taxonomyId=89&intsrc=kc_top& taxonomyName=operating_systems

54. N. Wingfield (2010, January 18), Internet Explorer: Should you stay or should you go?, retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/01/18/internet-explorer-should-you-stay-or-should-you-go/

55. S. Lohr & J. Markoff (2004, November 15), In the battle of the browsers '04, Firefox aims at Microsoft, New York Times, retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/15/technology/15browser.html