605
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Business groups in Portugal in the Estado Novo period (1930–1974): family, power and structural change

, &
Pages 49-68 | Published online: 10 Jul 2015
 

ABSTRACT

This article analyses the seven largest business groups in Portugal from the 1930s to the mid-1970s, a period in which they attained an unprecedented scale and scope. The analysis involves a comprehensive reconstruction of the groups' equity participations and corporate networks, using new sets of data. A few common features are found: these groups were based on family ownership and remained inward-looking, holding large equity participations in affiliate firms and segmenting them from more inclusive partnerships with other groups. But diversity should also be stressed: they displayed enormous plasticity in their dynamics of growth, combining exogenous and endogenous explanations. It is this plasticity that explains their resilience, capacity for adaptation, and ultimately their ubiquitous nature.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia for financial support (PTDC/HISHIS/099683/2008) and the two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Colpan and Hikino, “Foundations.”

2. Leff, “Industrial Organization.”

3. Drucker, Concept; Chandler, Strategy and Structure.

4. Granovetter, “Coase Revisited”; Morck, “The Riddle.”

5. Khanna and Yafeh, “Business Groups.”

6. For a summary, see Colpan, Hikino, and Lincoln, The Oxford Handbook; Morck, Wolfenzon, and Yeung, “Corporate Governance.”

7. Martins, Grupos; Santos, “Desenvolvimento.”

8. For details on the database on Portuguese business groups: http://historia-empresarial.fe.unl.pt.

9. Khanna and Yafeh, “Business Groups.”

10. Almeida and Wolfenzen, “Should Business”; Gonenc, Kan, and Karadagli, “Business Groups.”

11. Jones and Khanna, “Bringing History”; Khanna and Yafeh, “Business Groups.”

12. Schneider, “A Comparative”; Schneider, “Business Groups.”

13. Kock and Guillén, “Strategy and Structure.”

14. Amsden and Hikino, “Project Execution”; Colpan and Hikino, “Foundations.”

15. Puig and Torres, Banco Urquijo; Puig and Torres, “El Grupo Urquijo”; Valdaliso, “Grupos Empresariales.”

16. Guillén, The Limits.

17. Rosas, O Estado Novo; Clarence-Smith, The Third.

18. Silva, “Emergence.”

19. Guillén, “Capabilities Building.”

20. For a synthesis on the internationalisation of the Portuguese economy, see Afonso and Aguiar, “A Internacionalização.”

21. Silva and Neves, “Ties That Bind.”

22. Silva and Neves, “Business Coalitions.”

23. For a summary, see Colpan and Hikino, “Foundations.”

24. This synthesis on the Champalimaud group is based on Campos, “The Champalimaud Group.”

25. For the information on the CUF group presented in the next paragraphs, see Silva, “Emergence.”

26. For similar strategies in developing countries, see Langlois, “Economic Institutions.”

27. Amsden and Hikino, “Project Execution”; Colpan and Hikino, “Foundations”; Kock and Guillén, “Strategy and Structure.”

28. Chandler, Strategy and Structure and “The Functions.”

29. Neves, “The Borges & Irmão Group.”

30. Amaral, “Competition.”

31. Neves, “The Burnay Group.”

32. For a synthesis, see Confraria, “Política Económica.”

33. Lucena, A Evolução do Sistema; Rosas, O Estado Novo; Brito, A Industrialização.

34. Brito, A Industrialização; Confraria, Condicionamento Industrial.

35. For a discussion and the details of the legislation, see Amaral, “Imperfect But True.”

36. Pinho, “Sector público.”

37. Madureira, “O Estado,” 791–792.

38. Alves, Indústria da Pasta; Castro, Salazar; Pereira, Para a História; Ribeiro, Fernandes, and Ramos, “Grande Indústria.”

39. Valdaliso, “Grupos Empresariales.”

40. Faria, Alfredo da Silva, 242–260.

41. Pereira, Para a História.

42. Castro, Salazar.

43. Alves, Indústria da Pasta.

44. Khanna and Yafeh, “Business Groups.”

45. Leff, “Industrial Organization”; Langlois, “Economic Institutions.”

46. Almeida and Wolfenzen, “Should Business”; Gonenc et al., “Business Groups.”

47. Kock and Guillén, “Strategy and Structure.”

48. Amsden and Hikino, “Project Execution”; Colpan and Hikino, “Foundations.”

49. Silva and Neves, “Business Coalitions.”

50. Morck, “The Riddle,” 596.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 249.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.