106
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Oxygen Combustion Calorimetry of Samples Containing Phosphorus and Fluorine: Formation of Fluorinated Phosphoric Acids as Non-Ideal Combustion Species

, &
Pages 2103-2126 | Published online: 21 Oct 2008
 

Abstract

Whilst measuring the energy of combustion of a series of novel energetic polyphosphazenes which contained both phosphorus and fluorine in varying ratios, the non-ideal aqueous combustion species monofluoro-, difluoro- and hexafluoro-phosphoric acids were observed, in addition to the expected H3PO4 and HF. The same aqueous products were also observed to arise from combustion of physical mixtures of P- and F-containing compounds. A quantitative analytical method based on 19F NMR spectroscopy and Ion Chromatography of the bomb solutions was developed. However, since monofluoro- and difluoro-phosphoric acids are hydrolytically unstable, it was necessary to replace the water normally added to the bomb at the outset of the calorimetric experiments with an aqueous buffer solution to inhibit hydrolysis and hence obtain meaningful analytical data. Despite the relatively low precision ΔcU data obtained with the available adiabatic, static bomb calorimeter, the magnitude of the corrections to standard states accounting for the energy of (aqueous) hydrolysis of the fluorinated phosphoric acids were estimated. Two potential secondary standards for the oxygen combustion calorimetry of samples containing phosphorus and fluorine were identified and calorimetrically assessed.

Notes

‡(Reddy et al., Citation1970); CFCl3 was used as the internal reference.

†CFCl3 was the ‘nominal’ instrumental 19F reference.

†ΔcU values corrected for the energy of formation of aqueous HNO3, taken (Roux et al., 2001) as ΔfH° HNO3(aq) = − 59.7 kJ mol−1, and energy of dilution of crystalline H3PO4, taken (Bedford et al., Citation1960) as ΔdilU° H3PO4(aq) = − 12.12 kJ mol−1. The uncertainty intervals (not shown) were estimated as twice the standard deviation of the mean value of the replicate experiments and fluctuated between ±0.9 and ±2.0%.

‡Values rounded to the nearest 10 J g−1.

SD: standard deviation. The uncertainty intervals were estimated as twice the standard deviation of the mean value of the replicate experiments (referred to as ‘average’). The mean ΔcU values were rounded to 5 significant figures.

SD: standard deviation. The uncertainty intervals were estimated as twice the standard deviation of the mean value of the replicate experiments (referred to as ‘average’). The mean ΔcU values were rounded to 4 significant figures.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,493.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.