313
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Swirl and Cross-Flow Effects on Vitiated Jet Flames

, &
Pages 310-335 | Received 05 Apr 2012, Accepted 31 Jul 2012, Published online: 21 Feb 2013
 

Abstract

A burner was developed to accommodate extensive limits of firing for lean and rich fuel/air mixtures via efficient vitiation of the reactive streams by a pilot premixed flame jet under swirl and cross-flow effects. The stability and combustion characteristics of the corresponding normal and inverse triple flames were addressed for vitiating a double-swirled flow through a concentric vane swirler by a pilot stream swirled due to a tangential entry. Increasing the vitiating stream heat input ratio to 0.5 increased the stability limit to eight times the laminar flame speed as the inner swirl number increased to 2.0. Increasing the cross-flow air momentum flux ratio from 1.0 to 3.0 further increased the normalized stability limit to 8.5, while employing double coswirl and triple coswirl increased such limit to respective values of 10.2 and 11.9. Vitiating a double-swirled rich fuel/air mixture stream by a tangential entry-swirled lean fuel/air mixture stream enlarged the stoichiometric zone to pronounce a peak turbulent kinetic energy of 3.5 m2/s2. Increasing the fuel mass fraction gradient increased the stability limit only with a vitiating lean mixture, while increasing the swirled portion of the vitiating stream increased the normalized stability limit to 19.6. Allocating the counterswirl across the vitiated stream was more efficient to increase the normalized stability limit to 26.7 as the relative swirl angle reached 120°. Increasing the cross-flow opposing jet strain rate enhanced the H and H2 preferential diffusion, increased the temperature homogeneity, and reduced the flame length. There was a corresponding reduction in NOx emissions to a minimum of 38 ppm as the strain rate increased to 13000 s−1, while the normalized stability limit increased to 27.3. Decreasing the longitudinal spacing between the cross-flow stages from 12.0 to 4.0 cm decreased the NOx emissions further to 18 ppm and increased the normalized stability limit to 30.5.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,493.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.