186
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A comparative and experimental study on performances of Natural gas-Air Combustion, Helium, and Air as Propellants in a Gas Gun

, &
Pages 682-699 | Received 15 Mar 2020, Accepted 02 Jun 2020, Published online: 14 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

In this study, the performance of a single-stage gas gun with a natural gas-air mixture as the propellant gas is investigated by measuring the explosion pressure and the projectile velocity. In this work, the combined effect of elevated initial pressure, mixing, equivalence ratio, and ignition energy on the explosion pressure and projectile velocity is studied. To assess the performance of the natural gas-air combustion, a series of tests with helium and air as the propellant gas are carried out to measure the projectile velocity. The fuel used in this study consisted of 84.2% methane, 9.5% ethane, and 3.7% propane. The helium gas was 99.999% pure. The volume fraction of fuel in the natural gas-air mixture varied between 4.98% and 17.3%, and the flammability limits of the natural gas were between 4.41% and 14.47%. The equivalence ratio Φ was used to control the fuel concentration in the mixture. The equivalence ratio in this study was 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, and 2. The experimental results indicated that despite the low percentage of methane and high percentage of higher hydrocarbons in natural gas, the maximum pressure still occurs at the equivalence ratio 1, the finding which had already been proved to be the case for pure methane. However, the maximum combustion pressure is reduced compared to other fuels with higher methane and lower hydrocarbon content. Also, the study showed that the maximum combustion pressure increased with rising the ignition energy also when the mixer was used to blend the natural gas-air mixture. The experimental results showed that at low pressures, the projectile velocity was higher using helium compared to the same pressures produced by the combustion of methane-air mixture. However, at higher pressures, the projectile velocity was much higher for the pressures produced by combustion due to its lower molecular weight and the heat produced in the combustion process. The price analysis also indicated that for the same output pressure, the cost of a test with a methane-air explosion is 78 times lower than that of a test with helium.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website

Nomenclature

A=

Air

a0=

Speed of sound in Gas (m/s)

F=

Fuel

kV=

Kilo Volt

LEL=

Lower Explosive Limit

M=

Gas Molecular Weight (g/mole)

NG=

Natural Gas

P=

Pressure Behind Projectile (bar)

P0=

High Pressure Gas (bar)

R=

Gas Constant (L.Pa/Kg.mol)

T0=

Absolute Temperature (kelvin)

UEL=

Upper Explosive limit

V=

Projectile Velocity (m/s)

xi=

Volumetric Percentage

γ=

Specific Heat Ratio (Dimensionless)

Φ=

Equivalence Ratio (Dimensionless)

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,493.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.