190
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Combination Effect of in-Situ Combustion and Exhaust Gases Recirculation on 1D Combustion Tube: Numerical Approach

, &
Pages 3296-3309 | Received 04 May 2023, Accepted 17 Jul 2023, Published online: 01 Aug 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Despite the widespread use of renewable and green energy, the demand for fossil fuels is also rising due to increasing global energy demand. Therefore, unconventional solutions, with safe environmental impacts, are being pursued to solve this problem. Instead of getting rid of the exhaust gases in the surroundings, one solution might be to inject them with the oxidizer into the oil reservoir, to initiate an in-situ combustion (ISC) process to enhance oil recovery. A numerical study of a 1-D combustion tube has been conducted and validated to simulate the in-situ combustion process using enriched air as the oxidizer. The effects of injecting exhaust gases with the oxidizer are studied. Different ratios of oxygen to nitrogen are used in the enriched air as well as different ratios of exhaust gases. If enriched air which is mostly oxygen, i.e. 95% O2 +5%N2, is used, it is found that replacing 10% of the enriched air with exhaust gases can increase the oil recovery factor (ORF) from 94.7% to 94.9% and replacing 20% can improve oil recovery to 95.1%. For another enriched air, 60% O2 +30% N2, it is found that replacing portions of the enriched air with exhaust gases will reduce the oil recovery factor. In all previous cases, it was found that replacing the proportions of enriched air with exhaust gases reduces the amount of fuel burned and increases hydrogen production.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2023.2239480

Nomenclature and abbreviations

Cs=

Total solid concentration

EG=

Exhaust gases

EA=

Enriched air

hj=

The enthalpy of phase j

h*j=

The enthalpy of phase j at injection or production

k=

Permeability

kr=

Relative permeability

ORF=

Oil recovery factor

qhc=

The heat loss source/sink term.

rik=

The rate of kth reaction

Sj=

The saturation of phase j and xij is mole fraction of component i in phase j.

T=

Absolute temperature

U=

The internal energies as a function of temperature and phase composition

Ur=

Energy per rock volume

u=

Velocity component

Vj=

Velocity

wi=

The well productivity index

xij=

Mole fraction of component i in phase j

z=

Gridblock thickness

ρ =

Fluid phase density

λ=

Thermal conductivity of the formation

π=

Number of phases

θ j=

Mass production rate per unit volume

φ =

Porosity

μ j=

Viscosity of the fluid

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,493.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.