145
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sweet Corn Phosphorus Uptake from Sandy Soil Amended with Anaerobically-digested Manure

, &
Pages 2398-2413 | Received 24 Apr 2020, Accepted 31 Jul 2020, Published online: 01 Nov 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Anaerobic digester development on dairy, poultry, and swine confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) reduce manure storage, produce energy and are poised to supply a variety of nutrient-rich materials. Field experiments were conducted in the Columbia Basin of South-Central Washington to evaluate the yield response and phosphorous (P) use efficiency of sweet corn (Zea mayes convar. saccharata cv. Sheba) to the application of P from anaerobic-digested manures. Treatments consisted of the application of 0, 10, 20, 40 kg P ha−1 from five sources, three from anaerobic digesters (AD); AD-dairy P fine solids; AD centrifuged poultry solids; and AD dairy-derived struvite-P compared to a commercial poultry fertilizer, commercial mono-ammonium phosphate, and a non-amended control. Sweet corn yields were not significantly different among P amendments or rates of application but were different between years and were greater than the No-P treatment in 2014. Phosphorus recovery efficiency defined as that percentage of applied P recovered by sweet corn averaged 138% among treatments receiving 10 kg P ha−1 and declined to 57% for higher rates of poultry materials and the commercial mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP) in 2013 and declined 50% in 2014 due to lower yields. Although yield was not different the uptake of P among treatments was significantly greater than the unfertilized control. The lack of yield differences among rates of P applied indicates that P was not limiting yield and suggests that under these production conditions the application of 10 kg P ha−1 of any of the amendments was sufficient.

Abbreviations: AD: anaerobic digestion; ADD: anaerobic-digested dairy manure; ADP: anaerobic digested poultry manure; ADS: anaerobic-digested struvite; DM – dry matter; MAP – mono ammonium phosphate; PBP a commercial poultry fertilizer; PRD: percent P recovery efficiency difference method; PRB: percent P recovery balance method; PUE: Phosphorus use efficiency; AUE – Agronomic utilization efficiency.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the USDA Agricultural Research Service and in part from funding from the USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative, contract #2012-6800219814. The authors wish to thank M. Seymour and B. Boge (USDA-ARS, Grain Legume Genetics Physiology Research, Prosser, WA) and J. Mieirs (Washington State University, IAREC, Prosser, WA) for field assistance, R. Cochran (USDA-ARS, Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Wapato, WA) and M. Silva (Washington State University) for sample processing and laboratory analyses.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the USDA - National institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) - Agriculture and Food Research Initiative [#2012-3800219814].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 408.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.