![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
There are several methods for determining boron (B) in soil for soil testing purposes, yet variability among methods can lead to inconsistencies in determined concentrations for the same soil sample. The most typical method used to determine B in soil is hot-water B (HWB) extraction, but this method has reduced efficiency when dealing with large sets of soil samples along with other disadvantages such as non-uniformity in the boiling of samples. As a result, universal extractants have become increasingly popular for the extraction of B due to enhanced efficiency in a high throughput laboratory setting. This study uses a Deming regression model to compare the traditional HWB extraction method with two common universal extractants, Mehlich-1 (M1), and Mehlich-3 (M3), for coastal plain sandy soils. Results showed M3-B extractability is consistently higher than M1-B and HWB for all tested soils. The M3 method was then verified for precision using blind extension soil samples. The hot-water method was unsuccessful in producing reliable extractable B concentration in soils with high calcium carbonate and organic matter contents. Results from this study can be used to optimize B determination for high throughput production laboratory settings.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).