133
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Phosphorus Sorption Characteristics of Acidic Luvisols and Nitisols under Varying Lime Rates, and Response Validation Using Wheat

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 2196-2215 | Received 22 Nov 2021, Accepted 22 Feb 2022, Published online: 07 May 2022
 

ABSTRACT

This study investigated phosphorous (P) sorption characteristics under lime rates, and validated them under field conditions. Soil samples from nitisols and luvisols were taken, mixed with lime(tha−1) at[0,0], [5.25, 3.75], [10.5, 7.5] and [15.75, 11.25], respectively, and incubated for 30 days. It was equilibrated with KH2PO4 at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mgPL−1. The data were tested with Freundlich and Langmuir models. External P requirement (EPR) and changes in chemical properties were evaluated. The field validation on wheat involved rates of P (0, 8.2, 16.4, 24.6, 32.9, and 41.1 kg ha−1) and lime (0, 650, and 1300 kgha−1) in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Freundlich was found the best-fitted model. Freundlich coefficient (Kf) ranged from 212 to 45 mgPkg−1 (nitisols) whereas it was 112.7 to 16.29 mgPkg−1 (luvisols). EPR (kgPha−1) without and the highest lime rate were: nitisols (142.5 and 52.32 kgPha−1) and luvisols (124.84 and 25.94 kgPha−1). Liming reduced EPR by 63.3% (nitisols) and 79.3% (luvisols). Liming increased soil pH from [4.55 to 6.60 in the nitisols, and 5.33 to 6.51 in luvisols]; exchangeable acidity (cmol(+)kg−1) 3.84 to 0.01 nitisols, and 0.72–0.05 luvisols, and available P (mg/kg) 3.2–6.32 nitisol, and 2.74–8.72 luvisols. Furthermore, applying 32.9 kgPha−1 x 1300 kgha−1 lime resulted in grain yield (4345.2 kgha−1) that was 449% more than the untreated crop (791.3 kgha−1). The validation result suggested higher P than blanket P recommendation. It also justifies that excess P or lime alone cannot be a complete solution for P management and increased yield.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful Wolaita Sodo University for funding this research.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability

Data presented in this manuscript can be made available as per the policy of the journal.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the Wolaita Sodo University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 408.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.