21
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Validation of the Miniaturized Spectrophotometric Determination of Organic Carbon and Phosphorus in Soils

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 03 Mar 2023, Accepted 06 Jun 2024, Published online: 22 Jun 2024
 

ABSTRACT

The developments and innovations in green miniaturized technologies suggest that a complete miniature approach (MA) to determine organic carbon (OC) and phosphorus (P) in soils may enable handling a large number of samples. In comparison to the conventional approach (CA), this approach also reduces waste generation and analysis costs. Here we have miniaturized all the steps of the conventional analytical procedures for OC and P analysis and carried out an in-depth validation of MA on various aspects, including linearity, biases, precision, inaccuracy, and imprecision. This rigorous assessment aimed to delineate the effect of miniaturization on the quality of determination along with its associated benefits and limitations. The findings revealed a strong correlation between the MA and CA in the OC test, indicating an R2 >0.84, with the Deming regression producing a model equation demonstrating a highly significant slope and an intercept closely approximating zero. Similarly, the p values obtained by MA and CA exhibited a correlation with an R2 > 0.99, alongside the Deming regression displaying a minimal intercept and a slope approaching one. The Bland–Altman analysis indicated a mean bias of 0.01 (95% CI, −0.51 to 0.54) for OC values and −1.7 (95% CI, −9.04 to 5.57) for p values. This cross-validation study highlights the applicability and limitations of the MA in estimating OC and P levels across a diverse range of soils.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the partial financial support provided by Assam University, India. Further, we would like to thank the Indian Council of Agricultural Research Complex (ICAR), India, for providing the instrumentation facilities.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2024.2367252.

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by the Assam University, Silchar [20190000061].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 408.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.