Abstract
Relational theorists have been reluctant to codify technical principles, advocating instead a broad menu of sanctioned interventions and considerable freedom in the analytic moment. This stance, however, conflicts with the need for structure and discipline, which are necessary to conduct a coherent and purposeful analytic treatment. The attempts by four influential Relational theorists to resolve this tension are reviewed, as is the role of implicit community norms in shaping analytic conduct. A conceptualization of Relational technique, resting on the notion of therapeutic intent rather than on the antiquated criterion of objective correctness, is proposed.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Steven Tublin
Steven Tublin, Ph.D., is training and supervising analyst, William Alanson White Institute, and faculty and supervisor, Institute for Contemporary Psychotherapy.