213
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Forum

Response to “Response to Objectivism and Education”

Pages 296-309 | Published online: 30 Jan 2008
 

Abstract

This article is the fourth exchange in a discussion between Jamin Carson and David Elkind regarding constructivism and objectivism. Throughout the debate, which has been published exclusively in The Educational Forum (Elkind 2004, 2005; Carson 2005a), Elkind has maintained that constructivism is the best educational philosophy, that it is not relativistic, and that social consensus is the standard of truth. Carson, on the other hand, has argued that constructivism and social consensus are both logically self-refuting and relativistic, and that unless education is based on objective standards of truth—sense experience and reason—education is meaningless.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.