Notes
1Downie, in Downie and Parnell, eds., 13.
2Erne, 37.
3Empson.
4Jones, ed., 30 – 4.
5Hunter, 335 – 49. Hunter's scepticism about collaboration may be a reason why his essay is also ignored by Rasmussen, who puts forward an improbable case for Henry Porter (71 – 3). Honan says this “falls flat for technical reasons” (202), which he does not trouble to give.
6Lunney.
7For an old-spelling edition, see Gill, ed.
8MacLure, ed., xxxvi.
9“Marlowe and the Editors”, in Downie and Parnell, 53.