883
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluating a range of learning schedules: hybrid training schedules may be as good as or better than distributed practice for some tasks

&
Pages 276-290 | Received 21 Apr 2014, Accepted 23 Jun 2015, Published online: 21 Sep 2015
 

Abstract

We investigated theoretically and empirically a range of training schedules on tasks with three knowledge types: declarative, procedural, and perceptual-motor. We predicted performance for 6435 potential eight-block training schedules with ACT-R's declarative memory equations. Hybrid training schedules (schedules consisting of distributed and massed practice) were predicted to produce better performance than purely distributed or massed training schedules. The results of an empirical study (N = 40) testing four exemplar schedules indicated a more complex picture. There were no statistical differences among the groups in the declarative and procedural tasks. We also found that participants in the hybrid practice groups produced reliably better performance than ones in the distributed practice group for the perceptual-motor task – the results indicate training schedules with some spacing and some intensiveness may lead to better performance, particularly for perceptual-motor tasks, and that tasks with mixed types of knowledge might be better taught with a hybrid schedule.

Abstract

Practitioner Summary: We explored distributed and massed training schedules as well as hybrids between them with respect to three knowledge types based on theories and an empirical study. The results suggest that industrial and operator training in complex tasks need not and probably should not be done on a distributed training schedule.

View addendum:
Addendum

Acknowledgements

We thank Philip Pavlik for allowing us to use his Japanese-English vocabulary test materials, and Jeffrey Bolkhovsky for useful comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by DTRA [HDTRA1-09-1-0054] and ONR [N00014-10-C-0281 / N091-086/P10008; and N00014-15-1-2275].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 797.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.