Physiological responses to treadmill exercise in size- and fitness-matched male and female firefighter applicants

Abstract

Physiological responses during a standardised treadmill test for structural firefighting employment were compared in 41 pairs of size-matched, male and female applicants. Applicants wore personal exercise clothing, running shoes, and fire protective ensemble with self-contained breathing apparatus (added mass 21.2 ± 1.0 kg). Applicants walked at 1.56 m·s⁻¹, completing a 5-min warm-up, 8-min at 10% grade, and then, progressive 1-min stages to exhaustion. The cut-score required completion of 13-min of exercise. Up to the cut-score, no differences in heart rate, oxygen uptake or minute ventilation were detected between sexes. At time 12:30–13:00 min, V̇O₂ was 45.7 ± 0.6 vs. 44.2 ± 0.5 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹ (body mass) for males and females, respectively. Despite similar physiological responses at minute 13, females worked at higher fractions of peak than males (p < 0.05). A second analysis compared a subset of 27 fitness-matched (V̇O_2peak) male-female pairs. Fitness-matching further reduced or eliminated most observed differences in physiological responses, except small differences in breathing pattern.

Practitioner Summary: Physiological responses during a standardised treadmill test for firefighter applicants were investigated in male and female applicants matched on size and fitness. Absolute responses to exercise were the same for both sexes when size-matched, but relative intensity was higher for females. Fitness-matching reduced or eliminated most previously observed differences.

Abbreviations: NFPA: National Fire Protection Association; V̇O₂: rate of oxygen consumption; V̇O_2peak: rate of oxygen consumption at peak exercise; PAR-Q+: Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire Plus; SCBA: self-contained breathing apparatus; ANOVA: analysis of variance; V̇_E: minute ventilation; V̇_Epeak: minute ventilation at peak exercise; V̇_E/V̇O₂: ventilatory equivalent for oxygen.

Keywords:

• Physical employment standards
• sex differences
• cardiorespiratory fitness
• structural firefighting
• load carriage

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).