Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use a Fitts' task to (1) determine how control-display gain influences performance using a head-controlled computer input device; (2) compare relative sensitivity to gain and optimal gain between head control and hand/arm control; and (3) investigate control-display gain interactions with other task factors including target width, movement amplitude and direction. The task was a discrete target acquisition task using circular targets of 2·9 mm, 8·1 mm, and 23·5 mm, movement amplitudes of 24·3 mm and 61·7 mm, and eight radial directions including 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, and 315°. Each device was operated at four gain levels. Ten subjects participated. The results indicated that gain had a significant effect on movement time for both types of pointing devices and exhibited local minimums. Discrete target acquisition at all gains was aptly described using Fitts' Law for both input devices. The mouse gain resulting in minimum movement time and RMS cursor deviation was between 1·0 and 2·0. The minimum movement time and RMS cursor deviation for the head-controlled pointer occurred at a gain between 0·3 and 0·6. Average movement time at the optimal head-controlled pointer gain had a slope of 169 ms/bit and was more than 76% greater than at the optimal mouse gain with a slope of 135 ms/bit. In addition, average RMS displacement was more than 27% greater for the head-controlled pointer at its optimal gain setting than for the mouse. Gain had the greatest effect for small target widths and long movement amplitudes using the head-controlled pointer. Average movement time increased 37% when increasing the head-controlled pointer gain from 0·6 to 1·2 for the small target width, but only increased 0·3% when increasing gain for the large target width. Average movement time also increased 12% when decreasing the head-controlled pointer gain from 0·3 to 0·15 for the long movement amplitude, but decreased 0·3% when decreasing gain for the short movement amplitude.

Keywords:

• Gain
• Fitts' Law
• Human-computer interface
• Head movement
• Human disabilities
• Motor control
• Rehabilitation engineering

Additional information

Notes on contributors

ROBERT G. RADWIN

Correspondence to Robert G. Radwin, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, Wl 53706, USA