![Sample our Engineering & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5933/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Engineering-Tech.jpg"})
Abstract
Two laboratory experiments were conducted; first, to utilize the psychophysical approach (method of adjustment) to establish maximum acceptable frequency (MAF) for a sheet metal drilling task and, second, to examine the effect of sustained, static exertion upon objective and subjective measures under similar task conditions. In both experiments, the wrist posture (flexation, ulnar deviation) required by the task was varied. Twelve healthy females served as subjects. Results show that the psychophysical adjusted task frequency was significantly lower when wrist deviation was required, particularly flexion. MAF for one-third (25°) and two-thirds (50°) flexion were 88% and 73%, respectively, of those selected in the neutral posture. Furthermore, these results were supported by trends in grip strength, heart rate, blood pressure, EMG and perceived exertion. Results from the sustained exertion trials revealed that significant increases in physiological parameters occurred during 3-minute sessions and that this trend was exasperated with deviated wrist posture, particularly flexion. Considering results of both experiments, it was concluded that while the neutral wrist posture may be preferred for a drilling operation, task frequency should be reduced for deviated postures when redesign is not feasible and it is further recommended that deviation be limited to one-third maximum flexion (25°) and two-thirds maximum ulnar deviation (30°). It is also suggested that the psychophysical approach may be utilized to establish ‘acceptable’ parameters for other industrial tasks involving upper extremity stress, particularly in the current absence of more objective biomechanical and/or physiological criteria for reducing the risk of exposure to cumulative trauma disorders.