Abstract
Based on ethnographic research carried out in Malawi, this article discusses some bureaucratic procedures that are implemented with enthusiasm, even though they do not produce the effects they are designed for. These procedures seem to be more meaningful as aesthetic expressions rather than being the result of instrumental considerations. They create an image, albeit temporary, of a ‘legible’, well-organised society and a knowledgeable, caring state. That image may not reflect current realities in Malawi, but it points towards a future form of statehood towards which the country is progressing. The case study from Malawi is used as a basis for a discussion of the role of aesthetics in bureaucratic practice and some of its implications, including mediating between seemingly incompatible norms, and between local and abstract social realities.
Notes
Formally, FISP consists of annual stand-alone programmes with slightly different names but they are normally viewed as one continuous programme.
This claim is based on media reports, documents and information shared by one donor representative.
Aesthetics as a branch of philosophy is of less relevance here.
Handelman clearly acknowledges the aesthetic focus of bureaucrats, but this is expressed in public events (often organised by bureaucrats) rather than in everyday bureaucratic practice.
This statement is based on my various work assignments in development programmes in Malawi within the sectors of health, disability, HIV/AIDS and agriculture, where such registers have been a key focus.
Group village head Atikoliwe in Thyolo, according to The Nation, Malawi, 1 October 2008.