The endexine is more resistant to oxidation than the ectexine of most pollen grains because it is composed mainly of primarily accumulated sporopollenin on tuft units of plasma membrane glycocalyx origin. In ectexines that expand circumferentially the tuft units are separated and the spaces between filled by secondarily accumulated sporopollenin. The secondarily accumulated sporopollenin is less resistant to oxidation than that of the primary accumulation. The mature ectexine of Calluna pollen, recognized for its high resistance to oxidation in sediments, has tuft units that remain close-packed. In the ectexine of Calluna there is no space for secondarily accumulated sporopollenin. The ectexine and endexine of Calluna pollen are alike in density to electrons and contrast to stains.
Free access
Why the endexine and ectexine differ in resistance to oxidation. Calluna as a model system
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.