40
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effectiveness of standardized versus individualized hypnotic suggestions: A brief communication

, , &
Pages 1-5 | Received 29 Aug 1986, Published online: 31 Jan 2008
 

Abstract

The results of a number of studies indicate that hypnotizability is a relatively stable trait that has some predictive value for therapy outcome. Some authors argue, however, that hypnotizability scores are artifacts of standardized test procedures, and that more people will benefit from hypnosis when a broader range of suggestions is used. The present study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of standardized versus individualized suggestions. In a crossover design, counterbalanced for order of presentation, 48 Ss were tested twice: once with the Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale: Adult (SHCS: Adult) of Morgan and J. R. Hilgard (1975) and once with an individualized equivalent of SHCS: Adult. The results of this comparison showed no significant differences between the 2 methods. The present study does not support the concept of hypnotizability scores as artifacts of standardized measurements.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.