Abstract
This study deals with two drawbacks in a customary model for distinguishing the dynamically efficient paths in dynamic performance analysis and provides some corrections.
Notes
1 In mode Equation(1) the denominator of the first part of the objective function is equal to T + 1, while in Citation5 it is equal to T (compare model Equation(1) in the present paper and model M1 in Citation5). This part of the objective function shows the mean value of α t s whose number is T + 1. Hence the value of the denominator must be T + 1. This is a minor drawback in Citation5 and has been corrected here.