![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
Abstract
Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are used worldwide to suppress rodent populations. Owing to the highly toxic and persistent properties of ARs, farmland predators are increasingly being documented with residues in their systems. Our objective was to evaluate the usage of ARs in Delta, the main region where raptor carcasses have been collected for AR residue testing in British Columbia. We found that farmers most frequently engaged in rodent control (95%). Hobby farmers and residential owners only engaged in rodent control if rodents had been seen or had damaged their property. Products containing brodifacoum were most frequently applied (32%), which was also the most commonly found AR in raptors sampled in the region. Unintended misuse (17%) stemmed from a lack of understanding about the differences in toxicity of products. Our survey demonstrates the need for more information for land-owners regarding correct AR application and safe disposal of poisoned rodents.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Delta Farmland and Wildlife Trust for the funding to conduct this user survey. The former director of the trust, Christine Terpsma has given continual feed-back during the production of the manuscript. Together with her making contact with landowners, this feed-back has been invaluable. Irene Wilkin, previously at the Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency, has been most helpful answering questions about regulations pertaining to anticoagulant rodenticide application. We are most grateful to the landowners for taking the time to talk to us about rodent control on their properties; their cooperation and insights were indispensable. This work was supported by funding from Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program for species at risk.