This paper describes the widespread public image of mathematics as cold, abstract, and inhuman, and relates it to absolutist philosophies of mathematics. It is argued that this image is consistent with ‘separated’ values which help to make mathematics a ‘critical filter’ denying access to many areas of study and to fulfilling professional occupations, especially for women in Anglophone western countries. In contrast, an opposing humanized image of mathematics, consistent with ‘connected’ values, finds academic support in recent fallibilist philosophies of mathematics. It is argued that although these two philosophical positions have a major impact on the ethos of mathematics classrooms, there is no direct logicalconnection. It is concluded instead that the values realized in the classroom are probably the dominant factor in determining the learner's image and appreciation of mathematics (and hence, indirectly, that of society).
Values, gender and images of mathematics: a philosophical perspective
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.