451
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pre-service teachers’ understanding of probabilistic fairness: analysis of decisions around task design

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 997-1019 | Received 30 Sep 2018, Published online: 16 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

Probability education has fast become a contested area, with curriculum authorities in some countries recently suspending its introduction until the post-primary years. In other countries, children as young as 7 years are introduced to informal probability concepts. These recent international shifts in practice have contributed to a paucity of attention to the understandings of probability among pre-service and practising teachers. This presents implications for teacher educators who seek to provide opportunities for pre-service teachers (PSTs) to develop appropriate knowledge for teaching. This paper reports on the probabilistic understandings of a sample of 104 elementary PSTs. It focuses on one particular aspect of this knowledge – understanding of probabilistic fairness. The study examines the approaches taken by PSTs when designing fair and unfair activities for use in the primary classroom. We place particular attention on the variety of random generators selected and the features of the activities designed by PSTs to illustrate fairness. Almost half of participants successfully designed fair and unfair activities for three different random generators. Particular random generators, namely playing cards, dice and coins presented more challenge and less successful outcomes. The findings provide an initial step in unravelling the complexities of understanding probabilistic fairness and serve to inform the design of curriculum experiences in probability instruction in initial teacher education (ITE) contexts.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Mathematics at post-primary level in Ireland can be studied at Foundation level, Ordinary level or Higher Level. Until 2017, at each level students were awarded a grade ranging from A1 to F that include grades A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, C3, D1, D2, F.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 372.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.