303
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adaptive scheduling and tool flow control in flexible job shops

&
Pages 4035-4059 | Received 01 Dec 2006, Published online: 12 Jun 2008
 

Abstract

The recent manufacturing environment is characterized as having diverse products due to mass customization, short production lead-time, and ever-changing customer demand. Today, the need for flexibility, quick responsiveness, and robustness to system uncertainties in production scheduling decisions has dramatically increased. In traditional job shops, tooling is usually assumed as a fixed resource. However, when a tooling resource is shared among different machines, a greater product variety, routing flexibility with a smaller tool inventory can be realized. Such a strategy is usually enabled by an automatic tool changing mechanism and tool delivery system to reduce the time for tooling set-up, hence it allows parts to be processed in small batches. In this paper, a dynamic scheduling problem under flexible tooling resource constraints is studied and presented. An integrated approach is proposed to allow two levels of hierarchical, dynamic decision making for job scheduling and tool flow control in flexible job shops. It decomposes the overall problem into a series of static sub-problems for each scheduling horizon, handles random disruptions by updating job ready time, completion time, and machine status on a rolling horizon basis, and considers the machine availability explicitly in generating schedules. The effectiveness of the proposed dynamic scheduling approach is tested in simulation studies under a flexible job shop environment, where parts have alternative routings. The study results show that the proposed scheduling approach significantly outperforms other dispatching heuristics, including cost over time (COVERT), apparent tardiness cost (ATC), and bottleneck dynamics (BD), on due-date related performance measures. It is also found that the performance difference between the proposed scheduling approach and other heuristics tend to become more significant when the number of machines is increased. The more operation steps a system has, the better the proposed method performs, relative to the other heuristics.

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper has been supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (DMI-9996411 and DMI-9996417).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 973.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.