248
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A novel metric for determining the constraining effect of resources in manufacturing via simulation

, , &
Pages 3565-3584 | Received 14 Aug 2009, Accepted 25 Mar 2010, Published online: 01 Jul 2010
 

Abstract

This paper provides a novel method for determining the constraining effect of resources in a manufacturing system using discrete event simulation. Traditionally manufacturing systems are constrained by one or more bottlenecks. Eliminating or mitigating the bottleneck will speed up the system throughput. However, bottlenecking resources generally only refer to machines, and primarily focus on flow-shops not job-shops. One important resource we believe that is often overlooked is workers and their associated skills, and we propose that a particular skill could be flagged as a bottleneck resource. We define new metrics known as resource constraint metrics (RCM) for measuring the constraining effect of a resource on the entire manufacturing system. These metrics are flexible and differentiate between the constraining effects of machines and their requested skills. The metrics can also deal with complex workflows with alternative routing, alternative resources, calendars (a necessary consideration when dealing with workers), worker performance, and multiple modes of operation of machines (e.g. run, setup, and maintenance). The use of RCMs in simulation aids in real-world decision-making, by determining which resource should be focussed on and improved to reduce the overall system feeling constrained. This will have the effect of increasing throughput or at least providing the capacity for increased throughput.

Notes

Notes

1. Excess processing time that is incurred due to worker inefficiencies. See first paragraph on next page for a more detailed explanation.

2. EMRs will never be in queue for a machine. When a machine fails, an EMR is generated and instantly replaces the order that was on the machine at the time of failure.

3. This is a prediction within the simulation at run-time however, and may actually turn out to be wrong. For example, if the selected machine fails unexpectedly, the alternative machine may have been a better choice.

4. We use sample standard deviation, with Bessel's correction for measuring the spread of the results, which we store in a separate RDB. We do not use confidence intervals, since confidence intervals assume that the outputted results follow the normal model distribution which may not be the case.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 973.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.