Integrated product and container inventory model for a single-vendor single-buyer supply chain with owned and rented returnable transport items

Abstract

This study considers a single vendor supplying a single retailer with a finished product packed in returnable transport items (RTIs), such as containers, pallets or crates, to facilitate its safe shipment. Once received at the retailer’s site, the RTIs are emptied, cleaned, repaired if needed and returned to the vendor to be used for the next shipment. Because of unexpected events, such as damage of RTIs and/or shortage of labour to empty RTIs, the RTI return time is considered stochastic in this study. In case the return of empty RTIs is delayed, the vendor has the option to rent RTIs from a nearby service provider to avoid disruptions in the delivery schedule and finished product shortages at the buyer’s premise. We formulate the problem of coordinating the flow of both the finished product and RTIs and minimising the supply chain wide costs as a mixed-integer non-linear programme. For a convex objective function, we develop an efficient solution procedure that generates the optimal replenishment cycle, the optimal number of RTIs and the optimal number of trucks. The general optimisation model and the solution procedure are illustrated for the case where the RTI return time is exponentially distributed. In addition, we conduct an experimental study to assess the impact of the problem parameters on the decision variables. It is found that renting RTIs is especially beneficial in case both shortage cost and the risk of late RTI returns are high. In addition, the average RTI return time is found to be critical for the performance of the supply chain.

Keywords:

• joint economic lot size
• integrated inventory
• returnable transport item
• container management
• stochastic container return time
• container renting

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.