2,343
Views
73
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Game theory applications in production research in the sharing and circular economy era

Green product design with competition and fairness concerns in the circular economy era

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 165-179 | Received 16 May 2019, Accepted 12 Aug 2019, Published online: 29 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

In this paper, we consider green product design in a supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and two retailers, where retailer 1 aims at monetary profit maximisation, and retailer 2 has fairness concern. We consider two kinds of green products: a marginal-intensive green product (MIGP) and a development-intensive green product (DIGP). For the former, the green investment cost depends on the green level and the production quantity; while for the latter, the green investment cost depends on the green level solely. In each case, we investigate the impact of the retailer’s fairness concern by comparing the optimal solutions and supply chain performance with those in the basic models in which all the supply chain members aim at profit maximisation. We find that retailer 2 will set a higher retailing price and earn a smaller market share. Such inferiority increases as retailer 2’s inequity aversion increases or as the substitutability degree of the products offered by the two retailers increases. We also find that retailer 2’s fairness concern will always harm the manufacturer. If an equity outcome is achieved, the supply chain may achieve a better performance; however, if an inequity outcome is attained, the supply chain always performs worse.

Acknowledgements

We thank the AE and the three reviewers for their constructive comments. This research was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the grant no. 71871052, 71501037, 71832001, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program, and SJSU Central RSCA Grant. This work was also supported by the NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme (Grant numbers 71661167009, 3-RAA7).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1657249.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the grant no. 71871052, 71501037, 71832001, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program, and SJSU Central RSCA Grant. This work was also supported by the NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme (Grant numbers 71661167009, 3-RAA7).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 973.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.