Prospective memory and ageing: Is task importance relevant?

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Matthias Kliegel, Institute of Psychology, Department of Gerontopsychology, University of Zurich, Schaffhauserstr. 15, CH‐8006 Zürich, Switzerland (E‐mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Memory for activities to be performed in the future, i.e., prospective memory, such as remembering to take medication or remembering to give a colleague a message, is a pervasive real‐world memory task that has recently begun to attract the attention of numerous researchers. Age effects in prospective memory have been found particularly in complex paradigms requiring participants to remember to switch between several subtasks in a limited time period (e.g., Kliegel, McDaniel, & Einstein, 2000). Here, most of the older adults try to complete one or two subtasks and to forget the prospective instruction to work on all subtasks. Since recent findings in this context show that one profits from tips regarding the relevant task in complex double tasks, it seems likely that age effects in prospective memory tasks might also be due to the lack of information about the importance of the prospective task. To test this hypothesis, the importance of the prospective task was varied in the present study with 104 young and old participants by providing motivational incentives to interrupt and switch during the introduction phase (plan formation) as well as during the execution phase. Also, interindividual differences regarding nonexecutive as well as executive cognitive resources were analysed, thus allowing estimation of the relationship between these factors and (age‐related) performance in complex prospective remembering. The results show age effects in favour of the younger group in all task components of the complex prospective multitask. In contrast, there was no effect of the present experimental manipulation of motivational incentives. Finally, in regression analyses, intention formation, in particular, was found to be a significant predictor of intention execution, explaining most of the age‐related variance. In sum, our results specifically highlight the fundamental importance of adequately planning the complex intention and do not support the hypothesis that age‐related decrements in performance are reflecting a lack of motivation in the present complex prospective memory paradigm.

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Matthias Kliegel, Institute of Psychology, Department of Gerontopsychology, University of Zurich, Schaffhauserstr. 15, CH‐8006 Zürich, Switzerland (E‐mail: [email protected]).

Notes

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Matthias Kliegel, Institute of Psychology, Department of Gerontopsychology, University of Zurich, Schaffhauserstr. 15, CH‐8006 Zürich, Switzerland (E‐mail: [email protected]).