95
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review article

Solitary bees in Pampean agroecosystems: a review about current status of knowledge

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 30 Jan 2023, Accepted 12 Aug 2023, Published online: 24 Nov 2023
 

Abstract

The Pampean region constitutes one of the most extensive and productive grasslands in the world and experienced an abrupt agricultural expansion in the 20th century, which transformed the landscape into a mosaic of agricultural fields, extensive pasture lands for cattle, and scarce semi-natural habitats. These anthropic modifications strongly impact biodiversity, including solitary bees. In Pampean agroecosystems, the ecology of these important insects has been poorly studied. Here, we synthesise the information from our studies in four Argentine Pampean agroecosystems. Our aims are to present a reliable portrait of the diversity of solitary bees, provide a short overview of the current state of knowledge, compare our results with other studies carried out in the Pampean agroecosystem, and discuss the biological and anthropic threats. We analysed ca. 3500 individuals belonging to 82 wild bee species/morphospecies in 31 genera of five families, however, this does not represent the total richness, but serves as a baseline. Additionally, we analysed a total of 20 cleptoparasite bee species and other predator organisms (wasps, flies, and beetles). We found that low floral diversity (mainly exotic species), and the use of agrochemicals could be limiting solitary bee populations. In this current agricultural scenario, solitary bee species face a complicated situation as the crop homogenization and the low availability of semi-natural habitats play against their survival. We are facing a pivotal moment in which we must rethink how to produce food and other resources, adopting a more environmentally friendly management approach that considers all participants (animals, plants and ourselves).

Acknowledgements

We thank to Arturo Roig-Alsina for his eternal kindness and patience at each of our inquiries. To S. Durante and L. Compagnucci for collaboration in determination of some species. To M. Rosanigo, G. Molina, J. Sciarra, G. Cilla, S. Graffigna, G. Ramirez and J. Haedo for his help in the field. To Ramiro Saurral for help with the English revision. The manuscript benefited from critical reading by two anonymous reviewers. The owners of surveyed farms and the Universidad de Buenos Aires, for logistical support and permission to conduct our investigations.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

All individuals captured during the field works are deposited at the Entomological Collections of the General Botany Unit (FAUBA), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, and the Argentina and the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales (MACN), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Additional information

Funding

Field work was supported by grants PICT 2006-00851, PICT 08-12504, PICT 2015-2523, PICT 2017-3336, PIP-2020-3024CO and UBACyT G065. Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 236.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.